期刊文献+

不同静脉镇痛方法用于剖宫产术后伤口疼痛和子宫收缩痛的效果 被引量:2

Effect of different intravenous analgesia methods on postoperative incisional and uterine contraction pain after cesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价不同药物静脉自控镇痛用于剖宫产术后伤口疼痛和子宫收缩痛的效果.方法 美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级I~Ⅱ级剖宫产产妇400例,根据静脉镇痛药物不同分为四组:舒芬太尼组(S组,96例),舒芬太尼+氟比洛芬酯组(SK组,99例),布托啡诺组(N组,106例)和布托啡诺+氟比洛芬酯组(NK组,99例),麻醉方法采用蛛网膜下隙与硬膜外隙联合阻滞麻醉,手术结束时均接受静脉自控镇痛.记录产妇术后静息和动态伤口疼痛、子宫收缩痛数字评价量表(NRS)评分、镇静程度Ramsay评分以及不良反应.结果 400例产妇均完成观察.四组产妇的年龄、体重、孕周和手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).四组静息伤口疼痛NRS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).动态伤口疼痛NRS评分在术后13h时S组明显低于N组[(3.6±1.3)分比(5.4±1.2)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).子宫收缩痛NRS评分在术后4h和13h时,N组和SK组均优于S组[(1.3±1.0)、(1.1±0.9)分比(2.5±1.1)分,(1.6±1.0)、(1.4±0.9)分比(2.9±1.1)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).N组产妇镇静程度Ramsay评分和头昏发生率显著高于S组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).四组均未出现镇静过度病例.所有新生儿未发现有反应减弱或其他异常情况.结论 舒芬太尼联合非甾体抗炎药用于剖宫产术后静脉自控镇痛安全而且更有效,可以同时缓解产妇伤口疼痛和子宫收缩痛. Objective To evaluate the effect of different intravenous analgesia methods on postoperative incisional and uterine contraction pain after cesarean section.Methods Four hundred parturients (ASA Ⅱ-Ⅱ) undergoing cesarean section were randomly allocated into 4 groups,including sufentanil group (group S,96 cases),sufentanil combined with flurbiprofen axetil group (group SK,99 cases),butorphanol group (group N,106 cases) and butorphanol combined with llurbiprofen axetil group (group NK,99 cases).All the parturients received the operation under epidural combined with spinal anesthesia,and received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.Numerical rating scale (NRS) of postoperative rest and dynamic incisional pain and uterine contraction pain,Ramsay sedation scale (RSS),and PCIA-related adverse events were recorded for 24 h after operation.Results All the parturients were finished this study.The age,body weight,gestational weeks and operative time in 4 groups had no significant difference (P 〉 0.05).The NRS score of rest incisional pain was equivalent among the 4 groups (P 〉 0.05).The NRS score of dynamic incisional pain after operative 13 h in group S was significantly lower than that in group N[(3.6 ± 1.3) scores vs.(5.4 ± 1.2) scores](P〈 0.05).The NRS score of uterine contraction pain after operative 4,13 h in group N and group SK was lower than that in group S [(1.3 ± 1.0),(1.1 ± 0.9) scores vs.(2.5 ± 1.1) scores and (1.6 ± 1.0),(1.4 ± 0.9) scores vs.(2.9 ± 1.1) scores] (P 〈 0.05).The RSS scores and incidence rate of dizziness were significantly higher in group N than those in group S (P 〈0.05).No abnormality of new-horn infant was recorded in 4 groups.Conclusion Sufentanil combined with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs can perform effective and safe analgesia on postoperative incisional and uterine contraction pain after cesarean section.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2013年第18期7-10,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 镇痛 病人控制 剖宫产术 舒芬太尼 布托啡诺 氟比洛芬酯 Analgesia, patient-controlled Cesarean section Sufentanil Butorphanol Flurbiprofen axetil
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献12

共引文献6

同被引文献18

  • 1Khan ZP, Ferguson CN, Jones RM. a -2 and imidazoline re- ceptor agonists. Their pharmacology and therapeutic role [J].Anaesthesia, 1999, 54 (2) : 146 -165.
  • 2Gerlaceh AT, Murphy CV, Dasta JF. An updated focused re- view of dexmedetomidine in adults [ J ]. Ann pharmaeother, 2009, 43 (12) : 2064 -2074.
  • 3Lin TF, Yeh YC, Lin FS, et al. Effect of combining dexme- detomidine and morphine for intravenous patient - controlled anal- gesia [J]. BrJAnaesth, 2009, 102 (1): 117-112.
  • 4Martin E, Ramsay G, Mantz J, et al. The role of the a2 - ad-renoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine in postsurgical sedation in the intensive care unit [J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2003, 18 ( l ) : 29 -41.
  • 5Kehlet H. Muhimodal approach to control postoperative patho physiology and rehabilition. Br J of Anesthesia, 1997, 78 : 606 -617.
  • 6Stone LS, Wilcox GL. Alpha -2adrenergic and opioid receptor additivity in rat locus cneruleus neurons [ J ]. Neurosci lett, 2004, 361 (1-3): 265-268.
  • 7Willigers HM, Prinzen FW, Roekaerts PM, et al. Dexmedto- midine decreases pefioperative myocardial lactate release in dogs [J]. AnesthAnalg, 2003, 96 (3): 657.
  • 8Gunell E, Karabay Yavasoglu NU, Apaydin S, et al. Analysis of the antinociceptive effect of systemic administration of tramad- ol and dexmedetomidine combination on rat models of acute and neuropathic pain [ J]. Pharmacol Bioehem behav, 2007, 88 (1): 9-17.
  • 9张振泉,刘保江,梁慧莲,李占荣,张慧栋,杨卫玉.静脉镇痛泵中芬太尼按体重公式配置的可行性[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2008,24(6):495-497. 被引量:19
  • 10陈新建,陈彦青.α_2肾上腺素受体激动剂镇静镇痛作用的研究进展[J].医学综述,2011,17(9):1386-1388. 被引量:15

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部