期刊文献+

Audit Committee Attributes on Audit Fees: The Impact of Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (MCCG) 2007

Audit Committee Attributes on Audit Fees: The Impact of Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (MCCG) 2007
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The evolution of corporate governance has created a competitive environment among the companies to catch the attention of investor's confidence. This paper aims to examine the relationship between the audit committee attributes and the audit fees. Specifically, this paper aims to examine the effects of audit committee expertise (number of financial-related director's trainings and experience) on audit fees. The data are obtained from annual reports of the population of Bursa Malaysia listed companies for both Main and Ace markets in year 2008. The results show that audit committee size is significant and has a positive association with audit fees. However, audit committee's financial related training is significant and has a negative association with audit fees. These results suggest that financial training of audit committee could have an impact on the lower audit fees. However, audit committee expertise is significant and has a positive association with audit fees. This suggests that financial-related training is needed in order to enhance the expertise of audit committee members.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2013年第11期1442-1453,共12页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 audit committees audit fees corporate governance MALAYSIA 马来西亚 委员会 审计 费用 企业 属性 守则 专业知识
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2), 47-66.
  • 2Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1), 69-87.
  • 3Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1), 17-32.
  • 4Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting consideration of industry traits and corporate ovemance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 14-21.
  • 5Bliss, M. A., Muniandy, B., & Majid, A. (2007). CEO duality, audit committee effectiveness, and audit risks: A study of the Malaysian market. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(7), 716-728.
  • 6Boo, Y. K. (2003). Review of corporate governance in Asia: Corporate governance in Malaysia.
  • 7Bursa Malaysia Berhad. (2010). Corporate governance guide." Toward boardroom excellence (p. 55). Kuala Lumpur.
  • 8Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 356-384.
  • 9Che Ahmad, A., & Abidin, S. (2008). Audit delay of listed companies: A case of Malaysia. International Business Research, 1(4), 32-39.
  • 10Che Ahmad, A., Shafie, R., & Mohamad Yusof, N. Z. (2006). The provision of non-audit services, audit fees, and auditor independence. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2(1), 21-40.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部