摘要
莫里斯的符号观的核心,是将符号过程视为介于一个“载体”和两个“它者”间的联系的行为：“符号载体”指涉“意指”；“符号载体”引起“解释项”.这个符号观的两个“它者”范围太小,不能涵括很多符号现象；“符号载体”和“解释项”间其实并不是简单的引起关系；“意指”和“解释项”也不可能同时存在于符号过程中.莫里斯的符号观,受皮尔斯三元关系符号论和行为主义心理学的不足所限,未能达到预期效果.
The kernel of Morris＇view of sign is to regard semiosis as an action involving relations between one ＂vehicle＂ and two ＂othcrs＂ ： ＂sign vehicle＂ refers to ＂designatum＂ ; ＂sign vehicle＂ causes ＂interpretant＂. The scope of the two ＂others＂ are too narrow if sign is to encompass various kinds of signs; the relationship between ＂sign vehicle＂ and ＂ interpretant ＂ is not causal by nature; ＂ designatum ＂ and ＂interpretant＂ never get both involved in a semiosis. Morris＇ view of sign, inheriting Peirce＇s triadic view of sign and behaviorism, fails to meet Morris＇ expectation.
出处
《符号与传媒》
2014年第1期65-72,共8页
Signs & Media
基金
2012年浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“基于符内联系运行机制的符号理论研究”(项目编号:12JCWW18YB)的研究成果
关键词
莫里斯
行为主义符号论
意指
解释项
符号载体
Morris, behaviorist view of sign, designatum, interpretant,sign vehicle
