期刊文献+

我国碳排放权交易机制试点地区的ETS管理效率评价 被引量:21

Management efficiency assessment of seven Chinese pilots carbon emission trading systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以我国7个碳排放权交易机制试点地区的碳交易体系(ETS)和19个地区模拟ETS的设计方案、调研数据为基础,采用C2GS2模型作为基本工具构建数据包络分析模型(DEA)对碳交易机制的管理效率进行评价.结果显示,在7个试点地区中,北京、广东、深圳和重庆ETS机制的管理效率为DEA有效;上海和天津ETS处于规模递增阶段,湖北处于规模递减阶段,通过其在有效生产前沿面上的"投影"提出调整方案.建议:ETS覆盖的碳排放量低于地区总排放量的50%;下调中国核证自愿减排量(CCER)的碳抵消比例;紧紧围绕机制所覆盖的企业特征,进行投入要素规模设计;惩罚机制必不可少,但惩罚力度需根据本地区ETS投入要素特点进行设计;对ETS的碳排放上限(减排率)不宜设计过紧,否则可能对地区经济可持续发展能力造成损害. Based on the analysis of design proposals and survey data from seven Chinese pilot carbon emission trading systems(ETS) and simulation ETS of 19 regions, apply the C2GS2 model as the basic tools to build the data envelope analysis method(DEA) to evaluate the management efficiency of each ETS unit. The model assessment results showed that in the seven pilot ETS units, that of Beijing, Guangdong, Shenzhen and Chongqing are effective management under the DEA method, Shanghai ETS and Tianjin ETS are in the scale ascending stage, Hubei ETS is in the scale descending stage. For three non-DEA effective ETS units, their "efficient projections" on the production frontier surfaces were analyzed for proposing adjustment programs. This study suggests as follows: the coverage of ETS should be less than 50% of total regional emission; the proportion of CCER for compliance should be lowered; in-put factors of each ETS should reflect the feature of the regulated enterprises; punishment mechanism is essential and should be in accordance with violators' bearing capacity; the emission cap of ETS should not be designed too tight, or it may damage sustainable development capability of regional economy.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1614-1621,共8页 China Environmental Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(13YJAZH022) 英国繁荣战略基金项目"Impact Assessment of Guangdong ETS"
关键词 中国碳排放权交易试点 管理效率评价 DEA模型 Chinese pilot carbon emission trading systems management efficiency evaluation DEA model
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1北京市发展和改革委.北京市发展和改革委员会关于开展碳排放权交易试点工作的通知[EB/OL]http://www.bjpc.gov.cn/tztg/201311/t7020680.htm,2013-11-22.
  • 2广东省人民政府.广东省碳排放管理试行办法[EB/OL].http://zwgk.gd.gov.cn/006939748/201401/t20140117462131.html,2014-01-15.
  • 3广东省人民政府.广东省碳排放权交易试点工作实施方案[EB/OL].http://zwgk.gd.gov.crd006939748/201209/t20120914-343489.html,2012-09-07.
  • 4湖北省人民政府.湖北省碳排放权交易试点工作实施方案[EB/OL].站.http://www.hbepb.gov.cn/zwgk/zcwj/szfwj/201303/t20130304_59436.html,2013-02-18.
  • 5上海市人民政府.上海市碳排放管理试行办法(沪府令10号)[EB/OL].http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/shanghai/node2314/node2319/node2404/n31728/n31729/u26ai37498.html,2013-11-18.
  • 6天津市人民政府办公厅.天津市碳排放权交易试点工作实施方案[EB/OL].http://www.tj.gov.cn/zwgk/wjgz/szfbgtwj/201303/t20130304_188946.htm,2013-02-05.
  • 7天津市人民政办公厅.天津市碳排放权交易管理暂行办法[EB/OL].http://www.tj.gov.cn/zwgk/wjgz/szfbgtwj/201312/t20131224_227448.htm,2013-12-24.
  • 8Don Bredin, Cal Muckley. An emerging equilibrium in the EU emissions trading scheme [J]. Energy Economics, 2011,33:353- 362.
  • 9Harro van Asselt, Frank Biermann. European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: a legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures [J]. Energy Policy, 2007,35:497-506.
  • 10Damien Demailly, Philippe Quirion. European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2008,30:2009-2027.

二级参考文献21

  • 1魏权龄,卢刚,岳明.关于综合DEA模型中的DEA有效决策单元集合的几个恒等式[J].系统科学与数学,1989,9(3):282-288. 被引量:23
  • 2Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2(6) : 429-444.
  • 3Pittman Russell W. Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs[J]. Economic Journal, 1983, 93:883-891.
  • 4Fare Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf, Lovell C A K, Carl Pasurka. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1989,71(1):90-98.
  • 5Hailu Atakelty, Terrence S Veeman. Non-Parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the canadian pulp and paper industry[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001,83 (3): 805-816.
  • 6Seiford L M, Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002,142 : 16-20.
  • 7Scheel H. Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001,132:400-410.
  • 8Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance ,Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers,2003.
  • 9Fare Roll, Grosskopf Shawna, Pasurka Carl A. Environmental Production Functions and Environmental Directional Distance Functions: A Joint Production Comparison. Available at SSRN:http://ssrn. com/abstract= 506222,2004,19.
  • 10Magnus Lindmark, Peter Vikstrom. Global convergence in Productivity-A Distance Function Approach to Technical Change and Efficiency Improvements. Paper for the conference "Catching-up growth and technology transfers in Asia and Western Europe", Groningen 17-18 October, 2003.

共引文献356

同被引文献235

引证文献21

二级引证文献431

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部