摘要
盗窃罪的行为性质到底为何种性质,对此有不同观点,传统观点认为秘密窃取,新型观点认为平和窃取。通过分析比较两种性质的观点,结合与抢夺罪的互相比较,得出平和窃取不适合作为盗窃罪的性质,应该继续坚持传统秘密窃取作为盗窃罪的性质,以更好地指导司法实践。
There are different views about the nature of theft, a traditional one being secret theft while a modem one being peaceful theft. Through the comparative analysis of the two views, and comparison with snatch, we can conclude that the modem definition is not a suitable one. We should continue to adhere to the traditional view in order to better guide the judicial practice.
出处
《宁波广播电视大学学报》
2014年第3期53-57,共5页
Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University