期刊文献+

On the Motivation and Reasons of Popularity of Parody in Network Language From the Perspective of Conceptual Integration Theory

On the Motivation and Reasons of Popularity of Parody in Network Language From the Perspective of Conceptual Integration Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The Conceptual Integration Theory was first formally put forward in 1997 by Fauconnier and Turner. According to it, there is a conceptual blending network comprised of four mental spaces: Input space Ⅰ, Input space Ⅱ, generic space, and blended space. In the process of blending, common information or structures from input spaces are projected to the "generic space". Meanwhile, through partially cross-space mapping, those structures are selectively projected to the "blended space". By means of composition, completion, and elaboration, consequently "emergent structure" comes into being from the development of blending. This theory instantly became a fresh power in cognitive research field. With the rapid development of network technology and the popularization of the internet, network language makes tremendous progresses and spreads quickly, which reflects the social and cultural development. The uniqueness and effectiveness of network language creation, to a great extent, relies on various rhetorical devices, among which parody is frequently used and plays an important role. In recent years, studies about network language somehow concentrate a lot on the construction, word transformation, and features of network vocabulary, and cognitive analysis on the mechanism of parody in network language is rather limited and requires further exploration. This paper tends to probe into the motivation and the reasons ofparody's popularity in network language through some examples in light of Conceptual Integration Theory in hope of a better comprehension, appreciation, and application of parody in network language
作者 CHANG Yan
出处 《Sino-US English Teaching》 2014年第12期924-932,共9页 中美英语教学(英文版)
关键词 Conceptual Integration Theory PARODY network language motivation and reasons of popularity 网络语言 整合 原因 心理空间 混合空间 空间结构 融合网络 公共信息
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2003). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, (35), 54, 182.
  • 2Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2).
  • 4Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think." Conceptual blending and the minds hidden complexities. NewYork: Basic Books.
  • 5Hillert, D., & Swinney, D. (2002). The processing of fixed expressions during sentence comprehension. In A. Cienki, B. Luka, & M. B. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 6Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal ofPragmatics 3 7, 1555-1577.
  • 7Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc..
  • 8Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. J. (2008). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部