期刊文献+

简述李光地《离骚经九歌解义》的评注特色 被引量:1

On the Commentary Features of LI Guang-di's Lisao Jing and Jiuge Jieyi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 李光地评注《楚辞》的原因有三:一是对屈原遭遇产生共鸣并为其作品所感;二是不满旧注;三是宣扬儒家清廉节操的需要。此书的主要评注方法是先总后分,既较注重点明章句之间的相承关系、字词章句的比喻义,以及作品艺术特征的分析,也注重在阐发新意的同时兼驳旧说。其评注的不足主要是任意删减《九歌》篇目和一些说解错误。 There are three reasons why Li Guang-di noted Chu Ci: firstly, he resonated with Qu Yuan' s hard lot and was touched by his works; secondly, he was dissatisfied with the old notes; thirdly, it was the need to pro- mote the Confucian integrity. His main commentary method is to point out the mutual relations between the speci- fied sections and sentences and the figurative meanings of the words, sentences and sections, and to analyze the art features of the works. He refuted the former views while expressing his own. The deficiency of his commentary is mainly the arbitrary exclusion of the tables of contents of Jiuge and some explanation errors.
作者 黄建荣 江琼
出处 《东华理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第4期332-336,共5页 Journal of East China University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"<楚辞>训诂史"(10YJA740035)成果之一
关键词 李光地 《离骚经九歌解义》 楚辞 评注 LI Guang-di Lisao Jing and Jiuge Jieyi Chu Ci commentary
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1黄建荣,李蕊芹.论清代的《楚辞》文本传播与接受[J].东华理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011,30(2):121-126. 被引量:2
  • 2陈第.毛诗古音考·屈宋古音考[M].康瑞琮,点校.北京:中华书局,2008:209.
  • 3汪涟.安溪李文贞公解义三种叙[M]//(续修四库全书》编纂委员会.续修四库全书·集部二·楚辞类.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:243.
  • 4李光地.离骚经九歌解义[M]//(续修四库全书》编纂委员会.续修四库全书·集部二·楚辞类.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 5林云铭.楚辞灯[M].彭丹华,点校.上海:华东师范大学出版社.2012:8.

二级参考文献16

  • 1郭全芝.戴震的<屈原赋注>[J].江淮论坛,2001,(3):103.
  • 2蒋骥.山带阁注楚辞[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1958.
  • 3戴震.屈原赋注[M].合肥:黄山书社,1994.
  • 4姜亮夫.楚辞今绎讲录[M].北京:北京出版社,1991.
  • 5刘勰著.文心雕龙·辨骚[M].范文澜注.北京:人民文学出版社,1962.
  • 6刘永济.屈赋通笺[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
  • 7钱澄之.庄屈合诂[M].殷呈祥校点.合肥:黄山书社,1998.
  • 8郭建勋.从“恋乡”到“爱国”[N].光明日报,2004-11-24(02).
  • 9王夫之.船山全书·楚辞通释[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1996.
  • 10闻一多.楚辞补注[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2002.

共引文献1

同被引文献155

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

;
使用帮助 返回顶部