摘要
李光地评注《楚辞》的原因有三:一是对屈原遭遇产生共鸣并为其作品所感;二是不满旧注;三是宣扬儒家清廉节操的需要。此书的主要评注方法是先总后分,既较注重点明章句之间的相承关系、字词章句的比喻义,以及作品艺术特征的分析,也注重在阐发新意的同时兼驳旧说。其评注的不足主要是任意删减《九歌》篇目和一些说解错误。
There are three reasons why Li Guang-di noted Chu Ci: firstly, he resonated with Qu Yuan' s hard lot and was touched by his works; secondly, he was dissatisfied with the old notes; thirdly, it was the need to pro- mote the Confucian integrity. His main commentary method is to point out the mutual relations between the speci- fied sections and sentences and the figurative meanings of the words, sentences and sections, and to analyze the art features of the works. He refuted the former views while expressing his own. The deficiency of his commentary is mainly the arbitrary exclusion of the tables of contents of Jiuge and some explanation errors.
出处
《东华理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2014年第4期332-336,共5页
Journal of East China University of Technology(Social Science)
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"<楚辞>训诂史"(10YJA740035)成果之一
关键词
李光地
《离骚经九歌解义》
楚辞
评注
LI Guang-di
Lisao Jing and Jiuge Jieyi
Chu Ci
commentary