期刊文献+

The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma 被引量:77

The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The prognosis of patients with HCC still remains dismal. The life expectancy of HCC patients is hard to predict because of the high possibility of postoperative recurrence. Many factors, such as patient's general conditions, macroscopic tumor morphology, as well as tumor histopathology features, have been proven of prognostic significance. Female HCC patient often has a better prognosis than male patient, which might be due to the receptor of sex hormones. Younger patients often have tumors with higher invasiveness and metastatic potentials, and their survival and prognosis are worse than the older ones. Co-existing hepatitis status and hepatic functional reserve have been confirmed as risk factors for recurrence. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is useful not only for diagnosis, but also as a prognostic indicator for HCC patients. AFP mRNA has been proposed as a predictive marker of HCC cells disseminated into the circulation and for metastatic recurrence. Many pathologic features, such as tumor size, number, capsule state, cell differentiation, venous invasion, intrahepatic spreading, and advanced pTNM stage, are the best-established risk factors for recurrence and important aspects affecting the prognosis of patients with HCC. Marked inflammatory cell infiltration in the tumor could predict a better prognosis. Clinical stage is still the most important factor influencing on the prognosis. Extratumor spreading and lymph nodal metastasis are independent predictors for poor outcome. Some new predictive systems have recently been proposed. Different strategies of treatment might have significant different effects on the patients' prognosis. To date, surgical resection is still the only potentially curative treatment for HCC, including localized postoperative recurrences. Extent of resection, blood transfusion, occlusion of porta hepatis, and blood loss affect the survival and prognosis of HCC patients. Regional therapies provide alternative ways to improve the prognosis of HCC patients who have no opportunity to receive surgical treatment or postoperative recurrence. The combination of these treatment modalities is hopeful to further improve the prognosis. The efficacies of neoadjuvant (preoperative) or adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy or chemoembolization in preventing recurrence and on the HCC prognosis still remain great controversy, and deserve further evaluation. Biotherapy, including IFN-alpha therapy, will play more important role in preventing recurrence and metastasis of HCC after operation. The prognosis of patients with HCC still remains dismal. The life expectancy of HCC patients is hard to predict because of the high possibility of postoperative recurrence. Many factors, such as patient's general conditions, macroscopic tumor morphology, as well as tumor hictopathology features, have been proven of prognostic significance. Female HCC patient often has a better prognosis than male patient, which might be due to the receptor of sex hormones. Younger patients often have tumors with higher invasiveness and metastatic potentials, and their survival and prognosis are worse than the older ones. Co-existing hepatitis status and hepatic functional reserve have been confirmed as risk factors for recurrence. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is useful not only for diagnosis, but also as a prognostic indicator for HCC patients. AFP mRNA has been proposed as a predictive marker of HCC cells disseminated into the circulation and for metastatic recurrence. Many pathologic features,such as tumor size, number, capsule state, cell differentiation, venous invasion, intrahepatic spreading, and advanced pTNM stage, are the best-established risk factors for recurrence and important aspects affecting the prognosis of patients with HCC. Marked inflammatory cell infiltration in the tumor could predict a better prognosis. Clinical stage is still the most important factor influencing on the prognosis. Extratumor spreading and lymph nodal metastasis are independent predictors for poor outcome. Soma new predictive systems have recently been proposed. Different strategies of treatment might have significant different effects on the patients'prognosis. To date, surgical resection is still the only potentially curative treatment for HCC,including localized postoperative recurrences.Extent of resection, blood transfusion, occlusion of porta hepatis, and blood loss affect the survival and prognosis of HCC patients. Regional therapies provide alternative ways to improve the prognosis of HCC patients who have no opportunity to receive surgical treatment or postoperative recurrence. The combination of these treatment modalities is hopeful to further improve the prognosis. The efficacies of neoadjuvant ( preoperative ) or adjuvant ( postoperative )chemotherapy or chemoembolization in preventing recurrence and on the HCC prognosis still remain great controversy, and deserve further evaluation.Biotherapy, including IFN-alpha therapy, will play more important role in preventing recurrence and metastasis of HCC after operation.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2002年第2期193-199,共7页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献83

  • 1Allgaier HP;Deibert P;Olschewski M;Spamer C,BlumU,Gerok W,Blum HE.Survival benefit of patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated by a combination of transarterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection---a single-center analysis including 132 patients[J],1998(6).
  • 2WHO.World Health Report,2000.
  • 3Blakely T;Bates M;Garrett N;Robson B.The incidence of hepatocdlular carcinoma in New Zealand,1998.
  • 4Blakely TA;Bates MN;Baker MG;Tobias M.Hepatitis B carriage explains the excess rate of hepatocellular carcinoma for Maori, Pacific Island and-Asian people compared to Europeans in New Zealand[J],1999(2).
  • 5Beasley RP;Hwang LY;Lin CC;Chien CS.Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis B virus. A prospective study of 22 707 men in Taiwan,1981.
  • 6Beatsley PP;Hepatitis B virus.The major etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma[J],1988.
  • 7Rabe C;Caselmarm WH.Interaction of Hepatitis B virus with cellular processes in liver carcinogenesis[J],2000(5).
  • 8Caselmann WH;Alt M.Hepatitis C virus infection as a maor risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma,1996.
  • 9Moriya K;Fujie H;Shintani Y.The core protein of hepatitis C virus induces hepatocellular carcinoma in transgenic mice[J],1998.
  • 10Ray RB;Steele R;MEYER K;Ray R.Hepatitis C virus core protein represses p21WAF1/Cipl/Sidl promoter activity[J],1998.

共引文献395

同被引文献361

引证文献77

二级引证文献797

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部