期刊文献+

长脉宽1064nm激光与阿莫罗芬联用治疗甲真菌患者临床疗效观察 被引量:10

The Efficacy of 1064nm Long-pulse Laser Combined with Amorolfine Regimen for Patients with Onychomycosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨长脉宽1 064nm激光与阿莫罗芬联用治疗甲真菌患者临床疗效。方法甲真菌病患者144例,随机分为A,B,C 3组,分别给予5%盐酸阿莫罗芬甲擦剂、长脉宽1 064nm及长脉宽1 064nm激光与阿莫罗芬联用治疗,观察3组患者治疗后临床疗效、真菌学检查结果及不良反应发生情况。结果 A组有效率为58.33%,B组为60.42%,C组为81.25%,两两比较后结果显示,C组相比A,B组有效率更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,真菌镜检和真菌培养结果均显示A,B组阳性个数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),C组相比A,B两组阳性个数均较少,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。B,C组患者均出现局部温热感,3组均无疼痛、水疱、结痂等严重不良反应发生。结论长脉宽1 064nm激光与阿莫罗芬联用对甲真菌感染病患者具有较好的疗效,可促进患者病甲及皮肤的恢复,且使用安全。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of 1 064nm long-pulse laser combined with amorolfine regimen for pa- tients with onychomycosis. Methods One hundred and forty-four patients were randomly divided into the A, B, C groups, and were given 5% loceryl nail lacquer, 1 064nm long pulse laser and 1 064nm long pulse laser combined with amorolfine therapy respectively. The efficacy of the three groups of patients, mycological exam- ination results and adverse events were compared. Results Total effective rates were 58.33% ,60.42% and 81.25% for group A, B,and C respectively. Compared with group A and B,the effective rate of patients in group C was higher(P 〈0.05). After treatment,the microscopic fungi and fungal culture results were not sta- tistically significant between group A and B ( P 〉 0.05 ). Compared with groups A and B, patients in group showed less positive number of fungi ( P 〈 0.05 ). Group B and C patients had a partial warm feeling, the three groups were no serious adverse reactions such as pain, blisters, scabs occurred. Conclusion Long pulse laser in 1 064nm combined with amorolfine has good effect for patients with onychomycosis without se- rious adverse reactions.
出处 《中国皮肤性病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期475-477,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology
基金 河南省科技计划"973"计划项目(2013-2-013)
关键词 激光治疗 阿莫罗芬 甲真菌感染病 Laser treatment Amorolfme Nail fungal infections
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1胡燕,杨莉佳,戴迅毅,张海平,魏聆,华海康,戚稼,孙慧,郑渊,蒋屏东.无锡地区甲真菌病的临床及病原菌分析[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2005,34(10):662-664. 被引量:10
  • 2李筱芳,吕桂霞,沈永年,胡素泉,徐宏彬,陈伟,田伟,陈辉,佘晓东,刘维达.改良皮肤癣菌试验培养基在甲真菌病诊断中的应用[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2007,40(8):473-475. 被引量:5
  • 3李筱芳,沈永年,田伟,吕桂霞,胡素泉,徐宏彬,陈伟,陈辉,佘晓东,刘维达.甲真菌病临床诊断线索的初步探讨[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2007,23(10):862-864. 被引量:2
  • 4Shemer A, Davidovici B, Grunwald MH, et al. Comparative study of nail sampling techniques in onychomycosis[J]. J Dermatol,2009,36(7):410-414.
  • 5Nazarian RM, Due B, Deshpande A, et al. An improved method of surgical pathology testing for onychomycosis[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol,2012,66(4):655-660.
  • 6WilsmannTheis D, Sareika F, Bieber T, et al. New reasons for histopathological nailclipping examination in the diagnosis of onychomycosis[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol,2011,25(2):235-237.
  • 7Reza KT, Rhatigan R. Comparison between PAS and GMS stains for the diagnosis of onychomycosis[J]. J Cutan Pathol,2010,37(10):1041-1044.
  • 8Paugam A, L′ollivier C, Viguie C, et al. Comparison of realtime PCR with conventional methods to detect dermatophytes in samples from patients with suspected dermatophytosis[J]. J Microbiol Methods,2013,95(2):218-222.
  • 9Dhib I, Fathallah A, Yaacoub A, et al. Multiplex PCR assay for the detection of common dermatophyte nail infections[J]. Mycoses,2014,57(1):19-26.
  • 10Rothmund G, Sattler EC, Kaestle R, et al. Confocal laser scanning microscopy as a new valuable tool in the diagnosis of onychomycosiscomparison of six diagnostic methods[J]. Mycoses,2013,56(1):47-55.

共引文献21

同被引文献89

引证文献10

二级引证文献36

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部