摘要
纠纷当事人若要向法院提起民事诉讼,首先需在社会生活事实中选定由法院审理的事实的范围,再据此确定具体的诉讼请求。诉讼中诉讼请求项目上的替换与追加,既可能是因社会生活事实变更,也可能是因原告对事实的主观认识有所改变。同一程序能够容忍何种程度的变动,取决于所持观念是规范维持,还是纠纷解决。以纠纷解决价值观来判断诉讼请求能否变更,就是以同一社会生活事实为基准的变更原则,而宽容认知改变而导致的诉讼请求变更,以此充分发挥诉讼程序解决纠纷的能力,达到"案结"即为"事了"。
When a litigant brings a law suit, he needs to define the scope of facts that used in the procedure, and then determines his claims specifically. The change of litigious claim results from the change of objective facts or subjective cog- nition. What type of change may be permitted depends on the choice between norm maintenance value and disputes resolution value. From the perspective of disputes resolution, the change of subjective cognition shall not be prohibited so as to enhance procedure's ability in resolving disputes.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期112-121,共10页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
诉讼请求变更
规范维持观
纠纷解决观
change of litigious claim
norm maintenance
disputes resolution