期刊文献+

宫颈电切术史对妊娠分娩方式选择及妊娠结局的影响探究 被引量:7

Influence of cervical LEEP operation history on the childbirth and pregnancy outcome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究宫颈环形电切术(LEEP术)对妊娠分娩方式选择及妊娠结局的影响。方法:选取我院妇产科2010年3月至2012年6月收治的38例曾进行过宫颈环切术的产妇作为研究组,另外选取38例同一时间段未进行过LEEP术且进行分娩的产妇作为对照组,比较两组妊娠分娩方式选择及妊娠结局差异。结果:行LEEP术后的产妇早产率占21.05%(8/38),与对照组的早产率5.26%(2/38)相比明显升高,具有统计学意义,P<0.05。与对照组相比,顺产率、剖宫产率无明显差异,不具有统计学意义,P>0.05;研究组新生儿体重>3kg者占比与对照组所占比相比,无明显差异,且新生儿Apgar评分为满意的占比7.89%,较满意的占比92.11%,与对照组的0%和100.00%相比,无明显差异,P>0.05。结论:LEEP术后早产率增加明显,但是对顺产率、剖宫产率和新生儿体重的影响不存在明显差异。 Objectives: To explore the influence of cervical LEEP operation history on the childbirth and pregnancy outcome. Methods: 38 patients received the cervical LEEP operation in obstetrics and gynecology depart- ment of our hospital from March 2010 to June 2010 were chosen as the research group. And 38 patients who didn' t receive the cervical LEEP operation were chosen as the control group. The childbirth and pregnancy outcome of two groups were compared. Results: Compared with preterm birth rate (5.26%, 2/38) of the control group, the pre- term birth rate after LEEP was 21.05% (8/38), with statistically significant difference, P 〈 0. 05. There was no statistically significant difference in vaginal births and cesarean section rate between the two groups, P 〉 0. 05. There was no statistically significant difference in number of newborns whose weight 〉 3 kg, P 〉 0. 05. According to the neonatal apgar score, satisfying accounted for 7.89% and satisfactory accounted for 92.11%, which were not significantly different from the control group (0%, 100. 00% ), P 〉 0. 05. Conclusion: The prcterm birth rates af- ter LEEP significantly increased, but there were no statistically significant difference in vaginal births, the cesarean section rate and neonatal weight between the two groups.
作者 覃冬莉 宁丰
出处 《中国性科学》 2015年第6期78-80,共3页 Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
基金 广西南宁市卫生局科技计划项目(20123110)
关键词 宫颈环形电切术(LEEP术) 妊娠方式 妊娠结局 疗效 影响 Cervical loop electric cut method (LEEP) Pregnancy Pregnancy outcome Curativeeffect Impact
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献73

  • 1毕蕙,廉玉茹,李克敏.CINⅡ~ⅢLEEP治疗后随访情况分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(1):37-39. 被引量:97
  • 2赵丽芬,朱晓华,武晓敏.宫颈环形电刀切除术治疗212例宫颈上皮内瘤变价值探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(8):481-483. 被引量:55
  • 3毕蕙,李克敏,廉玉茹.CINⅡ~Ⅲ LEEP治疗后妊娠结局分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(10):1304-1306. 被引量:17
  • 4贺豪杰,潘凌亚,黄惠芳,郎景和.宫颈锥切术对宫颈上皮内瘤变患者妊娠及其结局的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(8):515-517. 被引量:43
  • 5Michelin MA,Merino LM,Franco CA,et al.Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol,2009,36:17-19.
  • 6Wright TCJr,Massad LS,Dunton CJ,et al.2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests.J Low Genit Tract Dis,2007,11:201-222.
  • 7Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth.Obstet Gynecol,2009,114:504-510.
  • 8Ortoft G,Henriksen T,Hansen E,et al.After conisation of the cervix,the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy.BJOG,2010,117:258-267.
  • 9Van de VijverA,Poppe W,Verguts J,et al.Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation:a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital.BJOG,2010,117: 268-273.
  • 10Berghella V,Pereira L,Gariepy A,et al.Prior cone biopsy:prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2004,191:1393-1397.

共引文献66

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部