摘要
本文考察了《俱舍论.破执我品》与《俱舍论》全论的关系,首先对日僧快道林常所提出、印顺法师所继承和主张的"《破执我品》是独立于《俱舍论》的论著"这一看法予以逐条批驳;继而提出:就《俱舍论》的主旨"人无我"而论,前八品与《破执我品》具有逻辑上的一致性与阐释上的互补性,《破执我品》是《俱舍论》的有机组成部分,是前八品的提炼和理论升华。
Based on the Sanskrit text,this paper gives an examination to the relationship between Pudgalavinicaya and the whole text of Abhidharmakoa. Affirming that,firstly,the last three verses of Chapter Eight is the ending of the whole text of Abhidharmakoakārikā,other than the beginning of Pudgalavinicaya,which is assumed to be an independent work; secondly,it is due to a lack of detailed examination upon the original text that we make a conclusion that Pudgalavinicaya is independent from the whole text; and thirdly,considering the major idea of Abhidharmakoa,Pudgalavinicaya is not only the former’s integral part,but also its philosophical sublimation.
出处
《北京大学研究生学志》
2010年第1期67-74,共8页
Graduate Students' Journal of Peking University
关键词
俱舍论
破执我品
Pudgalavinicaya
Abhidharmakoa