期刊文献+

中文版上肢技巧质量量表在脑性瘫痪患儿上肢功能评定中的信度和效度 被引量:11

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the quality of upper extremity skills test on upper limb function of children with cerebral palsy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估中文版上肢技巧质量量表(quality of upper extremity skills test,QUEST)在痉挛型脑瘫患儿上肢功能评定中的信度和效度。方法:将英文版QUEST翻译并完善成中文版,研究对象为75例在我院就诊的痉挛型脑瘫儿童,检测其重测信度及评定者间信度。同时进行Peabody运动发育量表的精细运动部分(peabody developmental motor scale fine motor,PDMS-FM),精细运动能力(fine motor function measure scale,FMFM),分析PDMS-FM原始分、FMFM各区分数与中文版QUEST各分测试项原始分之间的相关性,评估量表的平行效度。结果:中文版QUEST分测试项得分及总分具有优良的重测信度及评估者间信度(ICC值均>0.890),中文版QUEST分测试项原始分与PDMS-FM、FMFM各区原始分间具有较好的平行效度(Pearson/Spearson秩相关系数分别为r1=0.563—0.816、r2=0.389—0.830)。结论:中文版QUEST量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为评估痉挛型脑瘫患儿上肢运动功能的首选方法。 Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the quality of upper extremity skills test(QUEST) applying to measure the upper limb function in children with cerebral palsy.Method: English version QUEST was translated and improved into Chinese version. Seventy-five children with spastic cerebral palsy participated. All children accepted QUEST assessments, and the test- retest reliability and inter- rater reliability data were collected. Peabody developmental motor scale fine motor(PDMS- FM) and fine motor function measure scale(FMFM) assessments were taken at the same time. The correlation between the PDMS-FM, FMFM original points and QUEST raw score of each domain were analysed.Result: Four domains scores and total of Chinese version QUEST have excellent test-retest reliability and interrater reliability(ICC0.890). The strong association between QUEST and PDMS- FM(Pearson/Spearson r1=0.563—0.816), and the correlation index with FMFM(Pearson/Spearson r2=0.389—0.830) was demonstrated.Conclusion: The study confirmed that the Chinese version QUEST has good reliability and validity. It can be the first assessment tool as the evaluation of upper limb movement in spastic cerebral palsy children.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期41-44,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(201203053)
关键词 上肢技巧质量评估量表 上肢功能评定 痉挛型 脑性瘫痪 信度 效度 quality of upper extremity skills test upper limb function evaluation spastic cerebral palsy reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Smorenburg AR, Ledebt A, Deconinck F J, et al. Deficits in upper limb position sense of children with Spastic Hemipa- retic Cerebral Palsy are distance-dependent[J]. Res Dev Dis- abil, 2012, 33(3):971-981.
  • 2Park ES, Sim EG, Rha DW. Effect of upper limb deformi- ties on gross motor and upper limb functions in children with spastic cerebral palsy[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2011, 32(6): 2389~2397.
  • 3Rostami HR, Arastoo AA, Nejad S J, et al. Effects of modi- fied constraint-induced movement therapy in virtual environ- ment on upper-limb function in children with spastic hemipa- retic cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Neuro- Rehabilitation, 2012. 31(4):357-365.
  • 4徐开寿,何璐,麦坚凝,李金玲,靳晓坤,王丽娟.痉挛型脑瘫患儿的社会生活能力特征及其相关性研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2011,26(4):308-312. 被引量:21
  • 5DeMatteo C,Iow M,RusselI D,et al. Quality of Upper Ex- tremity Skill test[M]. Hamilton, Ontario: Neuro developmen-tal Research Unit, Chedoke Campus, Chedoke-McMasters Hospital,1992.1-80. S.
  • 6orsdahl AB, Moe-Nilssen R, Strand LL Observer reliability of the Gross Motor Performance Measure and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, based on video recordings [J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2008, 50(2):146-151.
  • 7Haga N, van der Heijden-Maessen HC, van Hoorn JF, et al. Test-retest and inter- and intrareliability of the quality of the upper-extremity skills test in preschool-age children with cerebral palsy[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 88(12): 1686-1689.
  • 8Klingels K, De Cock P, Desloovere K, et al. Comparison of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test in hemiplegic CP[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2008, 50(12): 904-909.
  • 9刘鹏,姜志梅,汤敬华,徐磊,宋福祥,戴梦颖,孙奇峰.中文版上肢技巧质量测试量表信度和效度的初步研究[J].中国康复,2013,28(6):424-426. 被引量:9
  • 10李晓捷,唐久来,马丙祥,秦炯,邹丽萍,王家勤.脑性瘫痪的定义、诊断标准及临床分型[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2014,29(19):1520-1520. 被引量:617

二级参考文献31

共引文献820

同被引文献81

引证文献11

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部