期刊文献+

核电厂动态灭火失效概率模型研究 被引量:1

Research on time-dependent model for analyzing nuclear power plant fire non-suppression probability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为量化火灾模型输入参数的不确定性对灭火失效概率的影响,推动我国核电厂动态火灾概率安全评估(PSA)的开展,基于火灾区域模型、蒙特卡罗模拟与马尔科夫链,建立核电厂动态灭火失效概率计算方法。将此方法应用于某压水堆核电厂一电子配电柜间,结合美国核管理委员会(NRC)修正后的消防队响应计算模型,得到房间内部电缆的灭火失效概率的累积时间分布。结果表明,通过考虑火灾模型输入参数的不确定性得到的灭火失效概率的累积时间分布为指数分布。 In order to quantify the impact of input parameter uncertainties on fire non-suppression probability and promote the development of dynamic fire PSA( probabilistic safety assessment) of nuclear power plants,a time-dependent model was built,which was based on the fire two-zone model,Monte Carlo simulation and Markov Chain. Taking an electronic cabinet room in a certain pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant as an example,distribution of fire non-suppression probabilities with time was obtained for the cable in a cable tunnel by using the fire brigade response model put forward by the United States NRC( nuclear regulatory commission). The distribution of cumulative fire non-suppression failure probabilities with time obtained by considering the uncertainty of the fire model input parameters is an exponential distribution.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期47-52,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家科技重大专项课题(2013ZX06002001-004)
关键词 核电厂 灭火失效概率 事件树模型 蒙特卡罗模拟 马尔科夫链 nuclear power plants fire non-suppression probability event tree model Monte Carlo simulation Markov chain
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Mycle Schneider, Antony Froggatt. World nuclear industry status report 2013 [R]. Paris: Mycle Schneider Consuhing, 2013:47 - 48.
  • 2Bijan Najafi, Robert P. Kassawara, Francisco Joglar-Billoch ,-et al. Historyof fire events in the U. S. commercial nuclear industry[C]. Proceedings of 10^th International Conference on Nuclear Engeering, 2002:1 -8.
  • 3R. Wachowiak, A. Lindeman. The updated fire events database : Description of content and fire event classification guid- ance[ R]. California: US Electric Power Research Institute, 2013.
  • 4M Roewekamp, W Werner, A Angner, et al. Focus on safety: The fire project[J]. NEA News, 2005,23(2): 24 -27.
  • 5Eun Jeong Cha, Bruce R Elligwood. The role of risk aversion in nuclear plant safety decisions[J]. Structural Safety, 2013, 44:28 -36.
  • 6Vinny Rubano, Kiang Zee, Joelle DeJoseph. Clarifications on treatment of VEWFDS to support NFPA 805 risk analysis, FAQ 13 - 0001[ R]. USA : Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2013.
  • 7Laurent Audouin. Special issue on PRISME-Fire safety in nuclear facilities[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2013, 62(Part A) : 79 - 79.
  • 8M H Salley, R Wachowiak. Nuclear power plant fire modeling application guide[ R]. NUREG - 1934. Washington DC : US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2011.
  • 9K Canavan, J S Hyslop. Fire probabilistic risk assessment methods enhancements[R]. NUREG/CR-6850 Supplement 1. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2010.
  • 10NFPA 805 -2010, Performance-based standard for fire protection for light water reactors electric generating plants[ S].

共引文献1

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

;
使用帮助 返回顶部