期刊文献+

非言语五因素人格问卷(FF-NPQ):一种半投射式人格测验评介

Five-Factor Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire(FF-NPQ): A Semi-Projective Test Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非言语五因素人格问卷(FF-NPQ)由Paunonen等人于2001年开发,用于测查人格五因素。它是一种半投射式人格测验,由60幅黑白图片组成,被试用7点李克特量表评价图中中心人物的行为。FF-NPQ多用于跨文化研究,也可用于文盲、老人或有语言、阅读障碍人群的人格研究。多个国家研究表明,FF-NPQ的内部一致性信度、与多个言语式五因素人格问卷的会聚效度及对行为的预测效度,均达到了心理测量学要求。在中国,该测验尚未使用,建议引进并根据使用情况修订。 Based on different item presentation modes, the personality test with five-factor approach can be divided into sentential self-report test, adjective checklist test and nonverbal test. At present, there are many sentential self-report tests and adjective checklist tests, however nonverbal personality tests are still rare. The Five-Factor Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire (FF-NPQ) was developed by Paunonen and his partners in 2001 and it is the only nonverbal personality test that has been widely accepted and used. Most items of FF-NPQ were selected from NPQ based on the five-factor model. There were five dimensions including extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness to experience, and they were classified into the five factors according to the correlation between NPQ and the five factors using construct-based method. Twelve items were selected from the four dimensions of NPQ, which had the highest correlation coefficients with the corresponding factor in the five-factor dimensions, and were then included in the final questionnaire. The only exception was the neuroticism dimension, which included 8 items of a dimension in the NPQ. Thirteen new items of neuroticism were redrawn and were tested together with the existing 8 items to select 12 most correlated items with neuroticism. Finally, the FF-NPQ contained 60 items and each factor was tested with 12 items. Each FF-NPQ item is a black and white picture, showing a central person engaging in a personality-related behavior. There will be one or more people in a picture and the one with black hair is the central person. Respondents are asked to consider the behavior depicted in the item and rate the probability that they would engage in a similar behavior and record their responses by selecting a number from a 7-point scale. FF-NPQ has good psychometric properties. Its internal consistency has been verified in more than ten countries, and almost all of the results were higher than the standard value of 0.7. In addition, its convergent validity with some verbal five-factor personality tests is acceptable. Moreover, the score of FF-NPQ can predict tobacco consumption, alcohol consumption, blood donations and many other complex behaviors. FF-NPQ enriches the forms of the five-factor approach personality test. It can be applied to cross-cultural researches and can also be used to measure the personality of illiterates, the aged and people who have problems in verbal expression or reading comprehension. FF-NPQ is a semi- projective test which combines projective test and self-report test. It is more objective than the projective test and can avoid the social desirability when compared with self-report test. However, little research about FF-NPQ has been done abroad or in China. It was developed in the West, so some items may not be suitable for non-western cultures and need to be carefully used in cross-cultural researches. FF-NPQ represents a trend in semi-projective personality test. It shows good reliability and validity and can improve the accuracy of the cross- cultural personality research, so it is worth being introduced and revised.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期479-484,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 非言语五因素人格问卷(FF—NPQ) 五因素取向 半投射式测验 FF-NPQ, five-factor approach, semi-projective test
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1陈基越,徐建平,黎红艳,范业鑫,路晓兰.五因素取向人格测验的发展与比较[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(3):460-478. 被引量:8
  • 2Boyle, G. J. (2008). Critique of the five-factor model of personality. Personality Theory and Assessment, 1, 295-312.
  • 3Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  • 4Church, A. T., Alvarez, J. M., Mai, N. T., French, B. F., Katigbak, M. S., & Ortiz, F. A. (2011). Are cross-cultural comparisons of persottality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personah'ty and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1068-1089.
  • 5Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personedity inventory NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • 6de Bruin, K., de Bruin, C. P., Dereksen, S., & Cilliers-Hartslief, M. (2005). Predictive validity of general intelligence and Big Five measures for adult basic, education and training outcomes. South African Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 46- 57.
  • 7Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2014). Cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires: Review of concepts and current guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidengology, 68, 435-441.
  • 8Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and socialpsychology (pp. 141 - 165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • 9Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five faetor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
  • 10Hong, R. Y. & Paunonen, S. V. (2009). Personality traits and health-risk behaviours in university students. European Journal of Personality, 23(8), 675-696.

二级参考文献31

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部