期刊文献+

增强CT用于临床诊断腹部肿瘤腹腔转移的价值分析与随机对照评价 被引量:33

Value Analysis on Enhanced CT Applied in Clinical Diagnosis of Peritoneal Metastasis of Abdominal Tumor and Randomized Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究增强CT用于临床诊断腹部肿瘤腹腔转移的价值。方法于2014年1月-2015年4月期间选取我院影像科CT室接诊的腹部肿瘤转移患者60例。按诊断方法不同分为观察组(增强CT扫描)和对照组(常规CT扫描),以手术病理检查结果为准,对比两组诊断正确率、最小种植灶面积、不良反应发生率。结果观察组诊断正确率为93.33%,较对照组的(83.33%)高,P<0.05;观察组诊断出最小种植灶为(1.00×0.70)mm2,较对照组的(2.72×1.80)mm2小,观察组种植灶平均宽度、长度均小于对照组,P<0.05;观察组不良反应发生率(3.33%)与对照组(0.00%)比较差异不显著,P>0.05。结论增强CT用于临床诊断腹部肿瘤腹腔转移有以下优势:对小种植灶具更高敏感性,显著提高诊断准确率;不良反应发生率低,安全性高。 Objective This paper is to look into the value of enhanced CT for clinical diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis of abdominal tumor. Methods Sixty patients with abdominal tumor metastasis admitted in CT Room, Division of Image of the Hospital from January, 2014 to April, 2015 were selected, and these patients were divided into two groups according to different diagnostic methods(enhanced CT scan) and the control group(conventional CT scan), surgical pathology results were referred, and the diagnostic accuracy, the area of minimum planted lesion and incidence of adverse reactions of two groups of patients were compared. Results The diagnostic accuracy of patients in the observation group was 93.33%, being higher than that of patients in the control group(83.33%)(P〈0.05). Minimum area of planting lesions of patients in the observation group hit(1.00×0.70) mm2, being lower than that of patients in he control group at(2.72×1.80) mm2, average width and length of planting lesions of patients in the observation group were less than those of patients in the control group(P〈0.05). There comparison difference in the incidence of adverse reactions on patients in the observation group(3.33%) and that on patients in the control group(0.00%) was not significant, P〈0.05. Conclusions Conclusions Enhanced CT delivers the following advantages in clinical diagnosis of abdominal peritoneal metastasis tumor: Higher sensitivity is imposed on small-size planting lesions, significantly improving the diagnostic accuracy. Enhanced CT is provided with low incidence of adverse reactions and high safety.
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2016年第5期110-111,125,共3页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
关键词 腹部肿瘤腹腔转移 增强CT 种植灶 不良反应 Abdomen Abdominal Metastasis of Abdominal Neoplasms Enhanced CT Planting Lesion Adverse Reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献90

  • 1吴湖炳,王全师,王明芳,王欣璐,郭晓君.PET/CT诊断恶性肿瘤及其转移灶的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2005,25(2):84-86. 被引量:40
  • 2杨秋蒙,坂东悦郎,川村泰一,米村丰.PET-CT诊断胃癌腹膜转移的临床价值[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(5):573-576. 被引量:23
  • 3吴乾喜,陈常勇,李慧,尹丹.16排螺旋CT多平面重建在上腹部肿瘤定位及侵犯范围评估中的价值[J].中国医学工程,2007,15(5):443-444. 被引量:3
  • 4蔡庆,沈玉英,徐建良,黄振健,周平,许传虓,施增儒.MRI对卵巢良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2007,17(8):773-776. 被引量:7
  • 5Wang Z, Chen JQ. Imaging in assessing hepatic and peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol, 2011, l 1 (19) : 1-14.
  • 6Dux M, Richter GM, Hansmann J, et al. Helical hydro-CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1999,23(6) :913-922.
  • 7Sendler A, Dittler HI, Feussner H, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer as precondition for multimodal treatment. World J Surg, 1995,19(4) :501-508.
  • 8Thie JA. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J Nucl Med, 2004,45 (9) : 1431-1434.
  • 9Chamadol N, Wongwiwatchai J, Bhudhisawasd V, et al. Accuracy of spiral CT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathological findings. J Med Assoc Thai, 2008,91 (3):356-363.
  • 10Low RN, Barone RM, Lacey C, et al. Peritoneal tumor: MR imag/ng with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium- containing contrast agents compared with unenhaneed MR imaging and CT. Radiology, 1997,204(2) :513-520.

共引文献102

同被引文献138

引证文献33

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部