期刊文献+

基于AHP-熵权法的地下水水质模糊综合评价——以白城市为例 被引量:19

Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method——A Case Study of Baicheng City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的模糊综合评价法采用超标加权法来确定其权重并用最大隶属度原则来确定水质级别,没有考虑数据的地域特点和最大隶属度原则的条件性,评价结果不理想。针对这些问题,采用AHP-熵权法以及引入级别特征值的概念,对地下水水质进行模糊综合评价。以2013年白城市20个地下水水质数据为依据,选取氟化物、总铁、亚硝酸盐氮、锰、总硬度、氯化物、硫酸盐、硝酸盐氮、氨氮共9个指标作为评价指标,进行地下水水质评价。并将其评价结果与内梅罗综合指数法进行对比,结果表明,两种方法计算的结果一致性高达75%。通过AHP法(层次分析法)与熵权法相结合确定的权重,以及引入级别特征值概念确定水质级别,使评价结果更加准确、合理。 Traditional fuzzy comprehensive evaluation determines the weights by over weighted method and determines the groundwa-ter quality grade by the principle of maximum degree of membership.Without considering regional characteristics of data and appli-cable conditions of level feature values,the evaluation result is not ideal.To solve these problems,this paper chooses fuzzy compre-hensive evaluation method,which determines the weight by AHP-entropy weight and determines the grade by the principle of max-imum degree of membership,to evaluate the groundwater quality.Taking F, Fe,NO-2 ,Mn,total hardness,Cl-,SO-4 ,NO-3 , NH+4 as evaluation indicators,20 samples of groundwater quality in Baicheng City in 2013 are evaluated.The comparison between the results of AHP-entropy weight method and the results of Nemero index method shows that the results of the two methods are nearly coincident to 75%.Determining the weights by mixing AHP with entropy weight and applying the principle of maximum de-gree of membership makes the results more exact and reasonable.
出处 《节水灌溉》 北大核心 2016年第6期51-54,58,共5页 Water Saving Irrigation
基金 国家自然科学基金(41572216) 国家自然科学基金(41172205) 吉林省自然科学基金(20140101164JC)
关键词 AHP法 熵权法 模糊综合评价 级别特征值 水质评价 AHP entropy weight fuzzy comprehensive evaluation level feature values water quality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1管延海,李强,柴成繁.模糊数学方法在天津市地下水水质评价中的应用[J].地下水,2008,30(2):27-28. 被引量:27
  • 2Zhou Yahong,Hao Gangli,Chen Kang,et al. Water quality evalu- ation based on fuzzy mathematics in groundwater resource area of SuoLuoShu in Shan Dong Province[J]. Advanced Materials Re- search, 2014,838-841 : 1 768-1 771.
  • 3Han Lu, Song Yonghui,Duan Liang, et al. Assessment methodol- ogy for Shenyang Chemical Industrial Park based on fuzzy com- prehensive evaluation[J]. Environmental Earth Scienees, 2015,73 (9):5 185-5 192.
  • 4卢文喜,李迪,张蕾.基于层次分析法的模糊综合评价在水质评价中的应用[J].人民黄河,2015,37(5):77-79.
  • 5Pan Jun, Li Boyao,Jiang Mingeen. Improved fuzzy equilibrium av erage type comprehensive evaluation method in the application of water quality evaluation[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 779-780:1 619-1 622.
  • 6T L Satty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • 7张先起,梁川,刘慧卿.基于熵权的属性识别模型在地下水水质综合评价中的应用[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2005,37(3):28-31. 被引量:73

二级参考文献8

共引文献98

同被引文献230

引证文献19

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部