期刊文献+

论双重股东代表诉讼的原告适格要件——兼评《公司法司法解释四(公开征求意见稿)》第31条

A Study on Plaintif Qualii cation Requirements of Double Derivative Suit —— With Comment on Draft of Company Law Judicial Interpretation Four Article 31 four article 31
下载PDF
导出
摘要 双重股东代表诉讼是单一股东代表诉讼的延伸,各国在原告适格要件上也注重保持和单一股东代表诉讼的一致。但是基于股份交换等情形,使得双重股东代表诉讼的原告适格要件势必要有所缓和。我国在构建双重股东代表诉讼制度上,应当首先承认母公司股东具有起诉的资格,调整单一股东代表诉讼在双重股东代表诉讼中的适用障碍,充分考虑股份交换等特殊并购情形对双重股东代表诉讼的原告资格的影响。 The dual shareholder representative litigation is the extension of the single shareholder representative action, and the nations also pay attention to maintaining the consistency of the single shareholder's representative action. However, based on the case of the exchange of shares, the dual shareholder representative action of the plaintiff eligibility requirements is required to ease the situation. In the process of construction of shareholder representative litigation system, China should first admit that shareholders of the parent company has qualification of prosecution, and they can adjust single shareholder lawsuit on behalf of double shareholder representative litigation, fully consider the effect of stock exchange and other special merger and acquisition of double shareholder representative litigation plaintiff qualification.
作者 钱瑾
出处 《广东开放大学学报》 2016年第5期36-42,共7页 JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY
关键词 双重股东代表诉讼 关联交易 同时持股原则 double derivative suit related party transactions contemporary ownership
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献42

共引文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部