期刊文献+

Changes in balance ability,power output,and stretch-shortening cycle utilisation after two high-intensity intermittent training protocols in endurance runners

耐力跑运动员在两种高强度间歇训练后平衡能力、输出功率及拉长——缩短周期的改变(英文)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Purpose:This study aimed to describe the acute effects of 2 different high-intensity intermittent trainings(HIITs) on postural control,countermovement jump(CMJ),squat jump(SJ),and stretch-shortening cycle(SSC) utilisation,and to compare the changes induced by both protocols in those variables in endurance runners.Methods:Eighteen recreationally trained endurance runners participated in this study and were tested on 2 occasions:10 runs of 400 m with 90 s recovery between running bouts(10×400 m),and 40 runs of 100 m with 30 s recovery between runs(40 × 100 m).Heart rate was monitored during both HIITs;blood lactate accumulation and rate of perceived exertion were recorded after both protocols.Vertical jump ability(CMJ and SJ) and SSC together with postural control were also controlled during both HIITs.Results:Repeated measures analysis revealed a significan improvement in CMJ and SJ during 10 × 400 m(p〈0.05),whilst no significan changes were observed during 40×100 m.Indexes related to SSC did not experience significan changes during any of the protocols.As for postural control,no significan changes were observed in the 40×100 m protocol,whilst significan impairments were observed during the 10×400 m protocol(p〈0.05).Conclusion:A protocol with a higher number of shorter runs(40×100 m) induced different changes in those neuromuscular parameters than those with fewer and longer runs(10×400 m).Whereas the 40×100 m protocol did not cause any significan changes in vertical jump ability,postural control or SSC utilisation,the 10×400 m protocol impaired postural control and caused improvements in vertical jumping tests. 目的:本研究旨在描述两种不同的高强度间歇训练对姿势控制、反向运动跳、蹲跳和拉长—缩短周期运动的短期影响,比较耐力跑者由这两种训练引起的相关变量的改变。方法:18名参加耐力跑业余训练的运动员参与研究,在两种情况下进行测试:10次400 m跑,每两次间隙休息90 s;40次100 m跑,每两次间隙休息30 s。训练中监测心率,运动后记录血乳酸浓度和自觉运动强度分级。两种训练中均控制纵跳能力和拉长—缩短周期的运用。结果:重复测量分析显示反向跳跃和蹲跳在10×400 m训练中显著提高,在40×100 m训练中无显著变化。拉长—缩短周期相关指数在两种训练中都无显著改变。姿势控制在40×100m训练中无显著变化,但在10×400 m训练中观察到明显障碍。结论:与少次长距离训练(10×400 m)相比,多次短距离训练(40×100 m)能导致神经肌肉参数发生不同改变。虽然40×100 m训练不能显著改善纵跳能力、姿势控制或拉长—缩短周期的运用,但10×400 m训练会损害姿势控制,并改善纵跳测试结果。
出处 《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 SCIE 2016年第4期430-436,共7页 运动与健康科学(英文)
基金 the University of Jaen for its support to the present study
关键词 Long-distance runner Postural control Reactive strength Training prescription Vertical jump 长跑运动员 姿势控制 反应力量 训练处方 纵跳
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部