期刊文献+

基于行人保护FLEX-PLI腿型的车辆前结构改进分析 被引量:2

Vehicle front structure improvement and analysis based on FLEX-PLI legform for pedestrian protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 欧盟新车评价规程Euro NCAP中的TRL腿型验算即将被FLEX-PLI腿型验算替代,所以针对前者开发的某款车型在使用新标准验算时不能得到满分。运用计算机仿真对该车型前端结构进行改进:去除前保险杠吸能泡沫;重新设计W形结构的下腿部保护横梁,在碰撞点对应位置增加与FLEX-PLI腿型宽度相同的加强筋,加大下腿部保护横梁与前保横梁的距离;改进导风板局部结构。对改进后前端结构进行FLEX-PLI腿型验算,达到得分为满分的目标。 The TRL legforrm checking calculation in Euro NCAP will be replaced by FLEX-PLI legform checking calculation , so a vehicle type which is designed on the basis of TRL legorm will fail to achieve full marks when the newstandard checking calculation is pushed out. The front structures of tliis vehicle are improved by computer simulation. The absorbing energy foam in front bumper is removed. The W- shape pedestrian cruris protection bumper is redesigned: the reinforcing ribs are added corresponding to the impact points and its width is equal to the legform width in Fprotection bumper and front bumper is increased, and the local structures oThe FLEX-PLI legorm checking calculation is carried out for the original and improved front structures,and the goal of full marks can be achieved.
出处 《计算机辅助工程》 2017年第6期36-40,共5页 Computer Aided Engineering
关键词 汽车安全 汽车前端结构 行人保护 FLEX-PLI腿型 vehicle safety vehicle front structure pedestrian protection FLEX-PLI legorm
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1沈宇明.行人交通事故人员伤害分析及防护措施[J].汽车与安全,2007(8):70-73. 被引量:10
  • 2World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013: Supporting a Decade of Action [R]. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2013.
  • 3Informal Group on Pedestrian Safety Phase 2 (IG PS2). History of Development of the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor, GTR9-C-04 [Rl. Bonn: Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP), 2011.
  • 4ALDMAN B, LUNDELL B, THORNGREN L. Physical Simulation of Human Leg-Bumper Impacts [C]// 1979 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Goeteborg, Sweden, 1979: 232-242.
  • 5NYQUIST G W, CHENG R, EL-BOHY A A R, et al. Tibia Bending: Strength and Response [J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 1985 (29) : 99-112.
  • 6YANG J K. Review of Injury Biomechanics in Car- Pedestrian Collisions [J]. International Journal of Vehicle Safety, 2005(1): 100-117.
  • 7YANG J K, KAJZER J, CAVALLERO C, et al. Computer Simulation of Shearing and Bending Response of the Knee Joint to a Lateral Impact [J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 1995(39) : 251-264.
  • 8ZANDER O. Open Questions and Proposals for ACL PCL and MCL Injury Thresholds, TEG-078 [R]. Bergisch: Flex-PLI Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG), 2008.
  • 9European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC). Improved Test Methods to Evaluate Pedestrian Protection Afforded by Passenger Cars, GTR9-4-05 [R]. Brussels: EEVC Working Group 17 Pedestrian Safety, 1998.
  • 10MATSUI Y, ISHIKAWA H, SASAKI A, et al. Impact Response and Biofidelity of Pedestrian Legform Impactors [C] // Proceedings of the International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts, Barcelona, International Research Council on the Biokinetics of Impacts (IRCOBI), 1999: 343-354.

共引文献27

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部