期刊文献+

硬规则时代的数据自由与隐私边界 被引量:10

Data Freedom and Privacy Boundaries in the Era of Solid Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人类社会正从软规则时代走向硬规则时代,其推动力量源于数据和算法。数据主义是21世纪的新宗教,数据自由是硬规则运行的前提。数据主义以产业发展与人类便利等"善"为由,呼吁数据自由与分享经济,但越来越多的事件表明不加控制的数据自由流动带来了严重的隐私安全隐患。隐私是人格尊严的先决条件,也是社会组织、道德伦理、法律问责机制的基石,规制数据权力与算法权力,保护隐私已变得刻不容缓。通过公法路径,以数据主权与数据监管对算法权力进行规制,通过私法路径,设置新型权利实现以权利稀释权力。构建适应硬规则时代的软规则体系,强化数据权力主体的自律与数据权利主体的自治,构建与硬规则相适应的软规则体系,守护好隐私边界。 The driving force of data and algorithms promotes the development of human society,moving from the era of soft rules to solid rules.Dataism is a new religion in the 21st century,and data freedom is a prerequisite for hard rules.Dataism calls for data freedom and sharing the economy on the grounds of “goodness” such as industrial development and human convenience,but more and more events show that uncontrolled free flow of data brings serious privacy risks.Privacy is a prerequisite for personal dignity and the cornerstone of social organization,ethics,and legal accountability.With regulating data power and algorithmic power,protecting privacy has become an urgent task.In terms of the public law path,data sovereignty and data governance should regulate the power of algorithms,and in terms of the private law path,new rights should be set to realize the right to dilute power,thus constructing a soft rule system that adapts to the era of solid rules.In addition,by strengthening the self-discipline of data power subjects and the autonomy of data rights subjects,a soft rule system adapted to hard rules can be constructed.Thus,we can guard the privacy boundary.
作者 肖冬梅 陈晰 XIAO Dong-mei;CHEN Xi(Faculty of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105,China)
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期59-65,共7页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"云环境下学术资源信息安全的法律保障研究"(14AZD076)成果
关键词 硬规则 数据主义 数据自由 隐私边界 solid rules dataism data freedom privacy boundary
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献105

  • 1刘作翔.权利冲突的几个理论问题[J].中国法学,2002(2):56-71. 被引量:330
  • 2周汉华.行政许可法:观念创新与实践挑战[J].法学研究,2005,27(2):3-24. 被引量:109
  • 3周志忍.当代政府管理的新理念[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,42(3):103-110. 被引量:66
  • 4Whitman,James Q., "The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty" (2004). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper649. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/649, pl207,2016 年 3 月 27 日访问.
  • 5Litman, Jessica, Information Privacy/Information Property. Available at SSRN: http://ssm.com/abstract=218274 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssm.218274, p5,2016 年 3 月 27 日访问.
  • 6U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Frame-work, A Guide to Self-Certification, http://www.trade.gov/media/Publications/pdf/safeharbor-selfcert2009.pdf,2016 年 3 月 27 日访问.
  • 7Report to The President Big Data And Privacy: A Technological Perspective Executive, Office of the President, President, sCouncil of Advisors on Science and Technology, May 2014,https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/flles/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_big_data_and_privacy_-_may_2014.pdf, p26,2016 年 3 月 27 日访问.
  • 8See Garrett, Brandon L., Big Data and Due Process (August 15, 2014). Cornell Law Review Online, Vol. 99, 2014.
  • 9VirginiaPublic Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-45. Available at SSRN: http://ssra,com/abstract=2481078, p108,2016 年 3月27日访问.
  • 10Solove,Daniel J., A Brief History of Information Privacy Law. PROSKAUER ON PRIVACY, PLI, 2006.

共引文献768

引证文献10

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部