“近亲繁殖”对学术产出究竟有何影响——基于文献综述的视角

How does “Inbreeding” Affect the Academic Output:Based on the Perspective of Literature Review

各国高校基于"政治正确"而非真正来自科学证据而反对"近亲繁殖",为开展"近亲繁殖"对于学术产出的影响研究提供了立论基础。那么,"近亲繁殖"对于学术产出是否有影响?如果有影响,影响是正向的还是负向的?高校人事工作应保持"宽容适度的近亲繁殖"还是保障"刚性的合理流动"?通过文献法梳理国内外有关"近亲繁殖"问题的历史与最新研究并进行分析,结果表明:绝大多数学者认为"近亲繁殖"对学术产出有影响;已有文献总体上倾向于"近亲繁殖"弊大于利,"近亲繁殖"已经严重影响高等教育学术职业发展。由于我国高等教育体系正处于发展阶段,学术劳动力市场尚不成熟,还未形成一定规模的国内乃至国际范围内的人才流动,因此中国学术"近亲繁殖"现象在中短期内仍会继续存在。但长期而言,"近亲繁殖"的比例必须严格控制在合理范围内。

Colleges and universities around the world oppose the inbreeding on the basis of "political correctness" rather than scientific evidence,which provides a theoretical basis for the study of the impact of "inbreeding"on the academic output. So,does inbreeding have an impact on the academic output? If there is an impact,is the impact positive or negative? Should the university personnel work maintain "tolerant and moderate inbreeding"or ensure "rigid and reasonable flow"? By reviewing and analyzing the history and latest research on the inbreeding at home and abroad,the results show that most scholars believe that inbreeding has an impact on the academic output;the existing literature generally tends to "inbreeding "has more disadvantages than advantages,and "inbreeding "has a serious impact on the educating academic career development. As China’s higher education system is at the stage of development,with immature academic labor market and no certain scale of domestic and international talent flow,therefore,the phenomenon of academic inbreeding in China will continue to exist in the short and medium term. But in the long run,the proportion of inbreeding must be strictly controlled within a reasonable range.