期刊文献+

Comparison of Methods for Estimating Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Beijing 被引量:1

Comparison of Methods for Estimating Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Based on the meteorological data from 1951 to 2015 in Beijing,the reference crop evapotranspiration(ET_0)in Beijing was estimated using the FAO 56 Penman-Monteith method,the FAO PPP-17 Penman method,the Hargreaves method,and the Priestley-Taylor method.The results showed that the monthly and annual changing trends of ET0 estimated by the four methods are basically the same.In general,the ET0 values estimated by the Hargreaves method are the closest to those of the standard method FAO 56 Penman-Monteith,while the difference between the FAO PPP-17 Penman method and the standard method is the biggest.The Hargreaves method is the most suitable method for the estimation of ET0 in Beijing. Based on the meteorological data from 1951 to 2015 in Beijing,the reference crop evapotranspiration( ET0) in Beijing was estimated using the FAO 56 Penman-Monteith method,the FAO PPP-17 Penman method,the Hargreaves method,and the Priestley-Taylor method. The results showed that the monthly and annual changing trends of ET0 estimated by the four methods are basically the same. In general,the ET0 values estimated by the Hargreaves method are the closest to those of the standard method FAO 56 Penman-Monteith,while the difference between the FAO PPP-17 Penman method and the standard method is the biggest. The Hargreaves method is the most suitable method for the estimation of ET0 in Beijing.
出处 《Meteorological and Environmental Research》 CAS 2019年第6期72-74,78,共4页 气象与环境研究(英文版)
基金 Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(41371065)
关键词 REFERENCE CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION method Comparison Reference crop evapotranspiration Estimation method Comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献61

共引文献169

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部