期刊文献+

利用TCGA数据库分析促性腺激素释放激素及其受体在乳腺癌中的表达及临床意义

Analysis of clinical significance of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its receptor in breast cancer utilizing TCGA database
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究促性腺激素释放激素(gonadotropin-releasing hormone,GnRH)及其受体(gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor,GnRHR)在乳腺癌中的表达情况,探索其临床意义。方法从美国癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genomes Atlas,TCGA)数据库下载乳腺癌患者GnRH、GnRHR基因表达数据和临床病理信息资料,分析GnRH、GnRHR与乳腺癌临床病理学指标和预后的相关性。结果乳腺癌组织中GnRH表达量低于正常乳腺组织(0.42 vs 1.27,P=0.000),其与年龄(U=134190.000,P=0.046)、人种(χ2=30.030,P=0.000)、淋巴结状态(U=126697.000,P=0.003)、ER(U=69435.000,P=0.000)、PR(U=99978.000,P=0.000)、HER2(U=53388,P=0.000)相关,以年龄≤55岁、黑人或非裔美国人、淋巴结阴性、ER阴性、PR阴性、HER2阴性者GnRH表达量较高。生存分析提示GnRH高表达组总生存期(overall survival,OS)优于低表达组(P=0.018)。乳腺癌组织中GnRHR表达量与正常乳腺组织相似(0.08 vs 0.07,P=0.778),其与年龄(U=133325.000,P=0.031)、人种(χ2=16.829,P=0.000)、ER(U=68438.000,P=0.000)、PR(U=92714.500,P=0.000)、HER2(U=66205.000,P=0.030)相关,以年龄>55岁、白人、ER阳性、PR阳性、HER2阴性者GnRHR表达量较高。GnRHR高表达组与低表达组间OS差异无统计学意义(P=0.719),亚组分析发现在三阴性乳腺癌亚组中GnRHR高表达组OS优于低表达组(P=0.028),而在非三阴性亚组中GnRHR与OS无相关性(P=0.976)。结论GnRH、GnRHR表达与乳腺癌部分临床病理学指标存在相关性,与乳腺癌(尤其是三阴性乳腺癌)的预后存在相关性。GnRH、GnRHR信号通路可能具有抑癌活性。 Objective To investigate the clinical significance of gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH)and its receptor(GnRHR)expression in breast cancer.Methods GnRH and GnRHR expression data in The Cancer Genomes Atlas(TCGA)database and its clinical information were downloaded.Statistically assessed was performed for relationship with clinicopathological factors and prognosis.Results The expression of GnRH in breast cancer tissues was lower than that in normal breast tissue(0.42 vs 1.27,P=0.000),and it was correlated with age(P=0.046),race(P=0.000),lymphnode status(P=0.003),ER(P=0.000),PR(P=0.000),and HER2(P=0.000).The GnRH expression was higher in patients whose age≤55 years,black or African American,lymphnode negative,ER negative,PR negative,and HER2 negative.Survival analysis suggested that the Overall Survival(OS)in GnRH high expression group was better than in low expression group(P=0.018).The expression of GnRHR in breast cancer tissues was similar to normal breast tissue(0.08 vs 0.07,P=0.778),and it was correlated with age(P=0.031),race(P=0.000),ER(P=0.000),PR(P=0.000),and HER2(P=0.030).The GnRHR expression was higher in patients whose age>55 years,white,ER positive,PR positive,and HER2 negative.There was no significant difference in OS between GnRHR high expression group and low expression group(P=0.719).Subgroup analysis showed that OS in GnRHR high expression group was better than in low expression group(P=0.028)in the triple negative breast cancer subgroup,while GnRHR was not associated with OS in the non-triple negative subgroup(P=0.976).Conclusion The expressions of GnRH and GnRHR are correlated with some clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer,and the prognosis of oreast cancer(especially triple negative breast cancer).The GnRH and GnRHR signaling pathways maybe have tumor suppressor activity.
作者 陆翔 陈彩萍 陶敏 Lu Xiang;Chen Caiping;Tao Min(Department of Breast Disease,the First Hospital of Jiaxing,Jiaxing 314001,China;Department of Oncology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China)
出处 《中华内分泌外科杂志》 CAS 2020年第5期381-386,共6页 Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
基金 嘉兴市第一医院院级课题(壹计划)(2018-YA-13) 嘉兴市医学重点学科-乳腺病学(创新学科)基金(2019-cx-04)。
关键词 乳腺癌 促性腺激素释放激素 促性腺激素释放激素受体 信使RNA Breast neoplasms Gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor(GnRHR) Messenger RNA(mRNA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Murugan AK, Dong J, Xie J, et al. Uncommon GNAQ, MMP8,AKT3, EGFR and PIK3R1 mutation in thyroid cancer [J]. Endoer Pathol,2011,22(2) :97-102.
  • 2Dummler B, Tschopp O, Hynx D, et al. Life with a single isoform of Akt: mice lacking Akt2 and Akt3 are viable but display impaired [J]. Mol Cell Biol,2006,26(21) :8042-8051.
  • 3Kirkegaard T, Witton C J, Edwards J, et al. Molecular alterations in AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3 detected in breast and prostatic cancer by FISH [J ]. Histopathology, 2010,56(2) : 203-211.
  • 4Chin YR, Yoshida T, Marusyk A, et al. Targeting AKT3 signaling in triple - negative breast cancer [J]. Cancer Res, 2014, 74 (3) : 964-973.
  • 5Mo X,Cao Q,Liang H,et al. MicroRNA-610 suppresses the prolifer- ation of human glioblastoma cells by repressing CCND2 and AKT3 [J]. Mol Med Rep,2016,13(3) : 1961-1966.
  • 6Grottke A, Ewald F, Lange T, et al. Downregulation of AKT3 increas- es migration and metastasis in triple negative breast cancer cells by upregulating S100A4 [J]. PLoS One,2016,11 ( 1 ) : e0146370.
  • 7Teng Y, Zhang Y, Qu K, et al. MicroRNA-29B (mir-29b)regulates the warburg effect in ovariancancerby targeting AKT2 and AKT3 [J]. Oncotarget,2015,6(38) :40799-40814.
  • 8Zhang Y, Guo X, Xiong L, et al. Comprehensive analysis of micro RNA-regulated protein interaction network reveals the tumor sup- pressive role of microRNA- 149 in human hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting AKT-mTOR pathway [J]. Mol Cancer,2014,13:253.
  • 9Chang S, Yao J, Suyama K, et al. N-cadherin regulates mammary tu- mor cell migration through AKT3 suppression [J ]. Oncogene, 2013, 32(4) : 422-430.
  • 10Paul-Samojedny M, Pudelko A, Suchanek-Raft R, et al. Knock- down of the AKT3 (PKB ~/) , PI3KCA, and VEGFR2 genes by RNA interference suppresses glioblastoma multiforme T98G cells invasiveness in vitro [ J ]. Tumour Biol, 2015,36 (5) : 3263-3277.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部