摘要
In order to provide channels of human resource management in promoting organizational learning,structural equation models were used for identifying the differences in the coupling dimensions between human resource archetypes and organizational learning modes based on sample data of 219 manufacturing firms with more than 100 employees.It is found that the coupling of the cooperative human resource archetype and exploitative learning is reflected in the mechanistic structure dimension;the coupling of the cooperative human resource archetype and exploratory learning is reflected in the two dimensions of the mechanistic structure and specialist cognition;the coupling of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype and exploitative learning is reflected in the two dimensions of generalist cognition and cognitive trust;the coupling of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype and exploratory learning is reflected in the dimension of generalist cognition.When manufacturing firms pursue exploitative learning,it is suggested that they pay attention to the structure dimension management of the collaborative human resource archetype and the cognition and affect dimensions management of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype.When manufacturing firms pursue exploratory learning,it is suggested pay attention to the structure and cognition dimensions management of the collaborative human resource archetype and the cognition dimension management of the entrepreneurial human resource archetype.
为推进组织学习提供人力资源管理“抓手”,以219家百人以上制造业企业为样本,采用结构方程模型分析了人力资源形态与组织学习方式耦合的维度差异.研究表明:协作型人力资源形态与利用式学习耦合表现在机械式结构维度;协作型人力资源形态与探索式学习耦合表现在机械式结构与专属性认知2个维度;创业型人力资源形态与利用式学习耦合表现在通用性认知与认知信任2个维度;创业型人力资源形态与探索式学习耦合表现在通用性认知维度.当制造业企业追求利用式学习,建议重视管理协作型人力资源形态的结构维度及创业型人力资源形态的认知与情感维度;当制造业企业追求探索式学习,建议重视管理协作型人力资源形态的结构与认知维度,同时重视创业型人力资源形态的认知维度.
基金
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.71764015).