摘要
明代陈洪绶曾在点评孟称舜的《娇红记》时,提出《娇红记》是一部“怨谱”。一般学者均将“怨谱”之“怨”与悲剧相联系,但实际上“怨”的内涵和来源更接近屈原“怨”的思想,并具有强烈的批判性。他对《娇红记》的评点也多围绕着“怨谱”一说来展开,强调戏曲中强烈的情感和节义观念、重视真实和语言美等,对金圣叹的评点也有所借鉴。这与他的遗民经历和受儒释道三教思想影响有着密切的联系。
When commenting on Meng Chengshun’s Jiao Hong Ji in Ming dynasty,Chen Hongshou pointed out that Jiao Hong Ji was a book of resentment.In fact,the connotation and origin of resentment may be closer to Qu Yuan’s thought of resentment.His comments on Jiao Hong Ji are mostly based on the theory of“Yuan Pu”,emphasizing the strong emotion and sense of propriety,the importance of truth and the beauty of language.Jin Shengtan’s comments are also used for reference.This is closely related to his experiences and ideas.
作者
李若然
LI Ruo-ran(College of Literal Arts, Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050000,China)
出处
《宜春学院学报》
2021年第8期100-104,共5页
Journal of Yichun University
关键词
陈洪绶
《娇红记》
怨谱
屈原
Chen Hongshou
Jiao Hong Ji
Yuan Pu
Qu yuan
