期刊文献+

鲁科版高中化学新教材学生必做实验解读及教学建议 被引量:4

Interpretation and Teaching Suggestions of Compulsory Experiments for Chemistry Textbooks of Senior High School Published by Shandong Science and Technology Press
原文传递
导出
摘要 化学实验是探究和学习物质及其变化的基本方法,是发展学生化学学科素养的重要途径,《普通高中化学课程标准(2017年版)》明确规定了18个学生必做实验。在分析新课标中必做实验的地位、内容与分布及相关建议和新鲁科版高中化学教材中18个学生必做实验的内容、特点的基础上,提出了相应的教学建议。 Chemical experiment is a basic method to explore and learn substances and their changes, and an important way to develop students’ chemical discipline core literacy. The Senior High School Chemistry Curriculum Standards(2017 Edition) clearly stipulates 18 students’ compulsory experiments. The corresponding teaching suggestions are put forward based on the several analysis, namely, the status, content, distribution of the required experiments in the new curriculum standards and the relevant suggestions, the contents and characteristics of 18 students’ compulsory experiments in the chemistry textbooks of senior high school published by Shandong Science and Technology Press.
作者 严文法 穆雯星 YAN Wen-Fa;MU Wen-Xing(College of Chemistry and Chemical Enginecring,Shaanxi Normal University,Ki'an 710119,China;Bijing Normal University China Basic Education Quality Monitoring Collaborative Innovation Center,Shaanxi Normal University Sub Center,Xi'an 710119,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第19期10-15,共6页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“跨学科视角下的中小学科学核心概念学习进阶研究”(项目编号:18YJA880103) 陕西师范大学基础教育改革2019年度项目“核心素养视域下中学教师素养为本的教学设计能力提升策略与实践”(项目编号:JCJY021)。
关键词 新鲁科版教材 必做实验 实验解读 textbook of senior high school published by Shandong Science and Technology Press(2019 edition) students’compulsory experiments interpretation of experiments
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1彭堃墀.非经典光场及其在量子信息中的应用[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),2007,30(2):173-180. 被引量:5
  • 2中华人民共和国教育部制定.普通高中化学课程标准(实验)[S].北京:人民教育出版社,2003:1—42.
  • 3George,K. D. A comparison of the critical-thinking abili- ties of science and non-science majors. Science and Edu- cation, 1967,51 ( 1 ), 11-18.
  • 4Novak, J. D. An approach to the interpretation and measurement of problem solving ability. Science and Ed- ucation, 1961,45 (2) : 122-131.
  • 5Stuessy, C, L. Path analysis: A model for the develop- ment of scientific reasoning abilities in adolescents. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1989,26 (1): 41-53.
  • 6Stieff, M. Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011,48 (10) : 1137-1158.
  • 7Pine,J. , Aschbacher, P. ,Roth, E. ,Jones,M. , et al. Fifth graders' science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2006,43 (5) : 467-484.
  • 8Kuhn, D. Teaching and learning science as argument. Science and Education, 2010,94 (5) : 810-824.
  • 9Teichman, L. The ability of science students to make conclusions. Science and Education, 1944, 28 (5): 268- 279.
  • 10Lawson, A. E. , Blake, A. J. D. Training Effects and Generalization of the Ability to Control Variables in High School Biology Students. Science and Education, 1975,59(3) :387-396.

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部