摘要
文章通过对“文津图书奖”科普类图书的出版信息、学科主题分布和读者评价等方面开展定量和定性分析,对比本土原创作品和翻译作品的差异,发现一方面“文津图书奖”科普类图书创作主题丰富,覆盖学科领域较广泛,另一方面也存在翻译作品比例偏高等问题。对此,文章建议科普图书评选应通过研究进一步明确科普图书划分标准;注重读者反馈评价,研究建立科普图书评价体系。对于科普图书创作和出版工作,需扩大创作者和出版机构队伍、提升作品专业性和普及性;挖掘本土原创科普图书的特色,全面提升本土原创科普作品竞争力。
The article focuses on award-winning popular science books in the“Wenjin Book Award”,comparing the differences between Chinese original works and translated works through quantitative and qualitative analysis of the publication information,subject distribution and readers’evaluation.On one hand,it is found that award-wining popular science books are rich in themes and cover a wide range of subject areas.On the other hand,there is also a high proportion of translated works in the“Wenjin Book Award”.In this regard,the article suggests that the selection of popular science books should be studied to clarify the criteria for the classification of popular science books.What’s more,evaluating readers’feedbacks and establishing an evaluation system for popular science books are crucial.For the creation and publication of popular science books,there is a need to expand the pool of creators and publishers,enhance the professionalism and popularity of the works,explore the characteristics of Chinese original science books,and improve the competitiveness of Chinese original science works in general.
作者
徐冰冰
马强
Xu Bingbing;Ma Qiang(National Library of China,Beijing 100081;Bureau of Science Communication,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100864)
出处
《科普创作评论》
2022年第2期16-23,52,共9页
Science Writing Review
关键词
书目分析
图书评价
文津图书奖
科普图书
bibliographic analysis
book evaluation
Wenjin Book Award
popular science books