期刊文献+

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术后早期尿失禁与膜性尿道长度的相关性研究 被引量:1

Relationship between early urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and preoperativemembranous urethral length
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨术前MRI测量的膜性尿道长度(MUL)与经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)后尿失禁的相关性。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年4月北京大学第三医院收治的96例因良性前列腺增生(BPH)行HoLEP患者的临床资料。患者年龄(70.0±7.7)岁, 体质量指数(23.9±2.9)kg/m^(2)。术前PSA为0.39~28.30ng/ml, 中位值为3.79(2.48, 6.03) ng/ml;22例(22.9%)合并糖尿病, 17例(17.7%)既往发生过≥1次尿潴留。术前MRI测量前列腺体积(60.5±35.0)ml。MUL定义为冠状位前列腺尖部与尿道球部之间的距离;术前MRI测量MUL为7~20 mm, 中位值13(11, 17) mm。所有手术均为单一术者完成。HoLEP术后2周对患者控尿功能恢复情况进行随访。比较HoLEP术后2周正常控尿组(无需使用尿垫)和尿失禁组(需使用尿垫)患者年龄、体质量指数、术前PSA、有无糖尿病、有无尿潴留、前列腺体积和MUL的差异, 将P<0.1的变量纳入logistic多因素回归, 分析HoLEP术后发生尿失禁的独立危险因素。结果术后2周正常控尿组72例(75.0%), 尿失禁组24例(25.0%)。单因素分析结果显示, 正常控尿组与尿失禁组的年龄[≥70岁者:27例(37.5%)与16例(66.7%)]、前列腺体积[≥60ml者:21例(29.2%)与13例(54.2%)]和MUL[<13 mm者:30例(41.7%)与20例(83.3%)]差异均有统计学意义(P值分别为0.013、0.027、<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示, 仅MUL<13 mm是HoLEP术后2周尿失禁的独立危险因素(P=0.003)。结论 BPH患者HoLEP术后2周发生尿失禁的比例较高, 术前MRI测量的MUL是预测HoLEP术后2周控尿功能恢复的独立危险因素。 Objective To assess whether urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate(HoLEP)is associated with membranous urethral length(MUL)on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.MethodsThe data of 96 patients who underwent HoLEP from January 2019 to April 2021 in Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.For all patients,the average age was(70.0±7.7)years old,the average body mass index was(23.9±2.9)kg/m^(2),median pre-biopsy PSA was 3.79(2.48,6.03)ng/ml,the average prostatic volume was(60.5±35.0)ml.22 patients(22.9%)suffered with diabetes mellitus,and 17 patients(17.7%)had at least one time urinary retention.MUL was measured on MRI as the vertical distance from prostatic apex to the entry of the urethra into the penile bulb.All patients"median MUL was 13(11,17)mm.The recovery of continence was followed up 2 weeks after HoLEP.The difference of age,body mass index,preoperative PSA,diabetes mellitus,urinary retention,prostate volume and MUL between urinary continence and incontinence group 2 weeks after HoLEP operation.The variables with P<O.1 were included in multivariable logistic regression to analyze the independent risk factors of urinary incontinence after HoLEP were compared.ResultsAll operations were successfully completed.The continence returned to normal in 72 cases(75.0%)and urinary incontinence existed in 24 cases(25.0%)in 2 weeks after surgery.There were 27 cases(37.5%)in continence group and 16 cases(66.7%)in incontinence group for those aged≥70 years.21 cases(29.2%)in continence group and 13 cases(54.2%)in incontinence group had prostate volume≥60 ml.There were 30 cases(41.7%)in continence group and 20 cases(83.3%)in incontinence group with MUL<13 mm.X^(2)test showed that age(P=0.013),prostate volume(P=0.027)and MUL(P<0.001)were related to the incontinence after surgery.The age,prostate volume and MUL were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.Multiple logistic regression showed that MUL<13 mm(P<0.001)was independent predictor for incontinence after HoLEP.ConclusionsThe incidence of urinary incontinence was high 2 weeks after HoLEP.Short MUL,which is less than 13 mm,is significantly associated with delayed recovery of urinary continenceafter HoLEP.
作者 刘可 张帆 颜野 肖春雷 张树栋 黄毅 马潞林 Liu Ke;Zhang Fan;Yan Ye;Xiao Chunei;Zhang Shudong;Huang Yi;Ma Luin(Department of Urology,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期21-25,共5页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺增生 膜性尿道长度 前列腺切除术 经尿道手术 尿失禁 Prostatic hyperplasia Membranous urethral length Prostatectomy T ransurethral surgery Incontinence
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1吴春磊,何岩,张春锋,刘沛,李建昌.钬激光前列腺剜除术学习体会总结及手术效果评价[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2020,0(3):210-213. 被引量:1
  • 2Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, KattanMW, et al. Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membra- nous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic reso- nance imaging. J Urol, 2002, 168: 1032-1035.
  • 3Myers RP, Cahill DR, Devine RM, et al. Anatomy of radical prostatectomy as defined by magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol, 1998, 159: 2148-2158.
  • 4Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, et al. Postprostatectomy incon- tinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol, 2009,55: 322-333.
  • 5Cambio A J, Evans CP. Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol, 2006, Nov; 50: 903-913,.
  • 6Kielb SJ, Clemens JQ. Comprehensive urodynamics evaluation of 146 men with incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urology, 2005, 66: 392-396.
  • 7Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello A J, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in can- didates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2010, 57 : 179-192.
  • 8van Randenborgh H, Paul R, Kubler H, et al. Improved urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy with preparation of a long, partially intraprostatic portion of the membranous ure- thra: an analysis of 1013 consecutive cases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2004, 7: 253-257.
  • 9Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, et al. Morbidity of laparo- scopic cxtraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2005, 48 : 83-89.
  • 10Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol, 2008, 179: 1907-1911.

共引文献37

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部