期刊文献+

三参数Normal-Ogive模型参数估计的SAEM算法

A Stochastic Approximation EM Algorithm for the Estimation of Item Parameters in the 3-Parameter Normal-Ogive Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Normal-Ogive模型是项目反应理论的代表性模型之一,其参数估计主要是基于MCMC抽样实现的,但MCMC抽样的不足是计算效率较低。针对这一问题,本文以混合模型(mixture model)的视角,通过变量扩充,提出三参数normalogive(3PNO)模型题目参数估计的随机逼近EM(stochastic approximation EM,简称SAEM)算法,并通过Monte Carlo模拟对SAEM算法的主要影响因素、计算效率、估计的返真性进行验证。模拟研究的结果表明:SAEM算法能够准确实现3PNO模型题目参数估计的计算,并且具有较高的计算效率,表现出优良的计算性质。 The normal ogive(NO)model is the first item response theory(IRT)model,which was developed by Lord(1953).However,the NO model has not been widely used in psychological and educational measurement since the estimation of parameters is of great low efficiency.The NO model derives from the assumption of normally distributed measurement error and is theoretically appealing on that basis.Recently a lot of the frontier IRT models were developed based on the NO model,for instance,the multilevel IRT model and the response time models.Therefore,to make sure the NO model can be applied in practice,a more efficient estimation approach must be developed for the NO model,which is the main work of our study.In this study,the 3-parameter NO(3PNO)model was revised to be a mixture model,and a stochastic approximation EM algorithm was developed for calculating the marginalized maximum a posteriori estimation(MMAP)of the 3PNO model.As an extension of the EM method,the SAEM algorithm must be more efficient than the MCMC sampler which is commonly used for estimating the NO model.Furthermore,the 3PNO model under the mixture modeling framework is the exponential distribution family.Sufficient statistics exist for the item parameters,which also greatly simplified the SAEM algorithm.To investigate the computation efficiency and the impact factors of the SAEM algorithm,two Monte Carlo simulation studies were constructed.Finally,an empirical example was analyzed to display the practical application value of the 3PNO model with the SAEMalgorithm.The results from the first simulation study demonstrated that the step size is very important for the performance of SAEM iteration.To ensure the SAEM algorithm is used accurately,we proposed some valuable suggestions for implementing the SAEM for the 3PNO model according to the results of the simulation study.In the second simulation study,the MMAPISAEM estimates displayed excellent accuracy,and it is greatly faster than the Gibbs sampler.Finally,the results of the empirical study are that the values of MMAPISAEM estimates were highly correlated with the same item characteristic values from classical test theory,furthermore,they were stronger positively correlated with the EAP estimates obtained by the MCMC samplers.Therefore,it can be concluded that the MMAPISAEM estimates are accurate and have high reliability.Furthermore,the fit of the 3PNO model is better than that of the 2PNO model for this real data.According to the results from both the simulation and the empirical studies,it can be concluded that the SAEM algorithm given by us is an accurate and efficient estimation method for the 3PNO model,which is superior than the 2PNO model.But,some important issues should be further clarified.First,an SAEM algorithm should be proposed for estimating the multidimensional NO model,because the multidimensional test is commonly used in psychological and educational measurement.Second,in recent years the four-parameter IRT model is receiving increasing attention and some studies have shown that the four-parameter model is valuable for testing design.Therefore,it may be interesting to propose an SAEM algorithm to estimate the 4PNO model.Finally,cognitive diagnostic modeling(CDM)in educational measurement has attracted much attention from researchers nowadays.However,its applications have been lagged by the computational complexity of model estimation.So,it is greatly valuable to give an SAEM algorithmforcalculatingtheCDM estimation.
作者 孟祥斌 刘佳 丁锐 Meng Xiangbin;Liu Jia;Ding Rui(KLAS,Northeast Normal University,Changchun,130024;Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun,130024)
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第2期450-460,共11页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 吉林省自然科学基金项目(20230101015JC) 国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2020年度教育学重大招标课题(VLA200005) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(19YJA880007)的资助。
关键词 项目反应理论 三参数Normal-Ogive模型 SAEM算法 item response theory 3-parameter normal ogive model stochastic approximation EM algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Azzalini, A. (1985). A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statisges, 12, 171-178.
  • 2Baker, F. B. & Kim, S. H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • 3Kang, T., & Cohen, A. S. (2007). IRT model selection methods for dichotomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 331-358.
  • 4Klein Entink, R. H., Fox, J. P., & van der Linden, W. J. (2009). A multivariate multilevel approach to the modeling of accuracy and speed of test takers. Psyehomettlka, 74, 21 --48.
  • 5Klein Entink, R. H., van der Linden, W. J., & Fox, J. P. (2009). A Box-Cox normal model for response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 621-640.
  • 6Lee, Y. H., & Chen, H. (2011). A review of recent response-time analyses in educational testing. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 359- 379.
  • 7Li, F. M., Cohen, A. S., Kim, S. H., & Cho, S. J. (2009). Model selection methods for mixture, dichotomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 353-373.
  • 8I.oeys, T., Rosseel, Y., & Batena, K. (2011). A joint modeling approach for reaction time and accuracy in psycholinguistic experiments. Psyehometffka, 76, 487- 503.
  • 9Meyer, J. P. (2010). A mixture Rasch model with item response time components. Applied Psycbological Measurement, 34, 521-538.
  • 10Meng, X. B., Tan, J., & Chang, H. H. (2015). A conditional joint modeling approach for locally dependent item responses and response times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 1-27.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部