期刊文献+

基于磁共振胰胆管成像的胆总管几何结构参数与胆囊结石发生的相关性研究 被引量:1

Study on Correlation Between Geometric Structure Parameters of Common Bile Duct and Occurrence of Gallstones Based on Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:基于磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)技术分析胆总管几何结构参数与胆囊结石发生的相关性。方法:选取2019年1月—2021年6月于中国人民解放军北部战区总医院行MRCP检查的180例患者作为研究对象,根据有无胆囊结石分为胆囊结石组与无胆囊结石组,依据冠状位3D-MRCP图像,比较两组胆总管的转角、长度、最大离散距离、最大直径、转角处直径。结果:两组胆总管转角、最大离散距离、最大直径、转角处直径比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);胆囊结石组胆总管长度长于无胆囊结石组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。胆总管长度诊断胆囊结石的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.672,最佳截断值为59.35mm。结论:胆囊结石的发生与胆总管几何结构有一定相关性,当胆总管长度>59.35mm时,临床医生应高度重视,采取针对性措施预防胆囊结石的发生。 Objective:To analyze the correlation between geometric structure parameters of common bile duct and occurrence of gallstones based on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP).Methods:A total of 180 patients who underwent MRCP examination in General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from January 2019 to June 2021 were selected as the study subjects.According to the presence/absence of gallstones,they were divided into gallstones group and no-gallstones group.Based on the coronary 3D-MRCP image,the common bile duct angle,length,maximum discrete distance,maximum diameter and diameter at the angle were compared between two groups.Results:There was no statistical difference in the common bile duct angle,maximum discrete distance,maximum diameter,and diameter at the angle between the two groups(P>0.05).The length of the common bile duct in the gallstones group was longer than that in the no-gallstones group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001).The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of common bile duct length for the diagnosis of gallstones was 0.672,and the optimal cut-off value was 59.35 mm.Conclusion:The occurrence of gallstones is related to geometric structure of the common bile duct,and clinicians should pay high attention and take the targeted measures to prevent the occurrence of gallstones when the length of the common bile duct is>59.35 mm.
作者 王冬雪 邹明宇 段劲锋 张哲 马贺骥 郭莲怡 Wang Dongxue;Zou Mingyu;Duan Jinfeng;Zhang Zhe;Ma Heji;Guo Lianyi(Postgraduate Training Base of the 967th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army,Jinzhou Medical University,Dalian 116021,Liaoning Province,China;Department of Radiology Diagnostics,General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army,Shenyang 110016,Liaoning Province,China;Department of General Surgery,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110042,Liaoning Province,China;Department of Radiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou 121001,Liaoning Province,China;Department of Gastroenterology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou 121001,Liaoning Province,China)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2023年第17期52-54,共3页 Chinese Community Doctors
基金 辽宁省科学技术计划项目(编号:2019JH8/10300033)。
关键词 胆总管 几何结构 胆囊结石 磁共振胰胆管成像 Common bile duct Geometric structure Gallstones MRCP
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1方学文,沈君,梁碧玲,陈星强,郑晓林,郭友,陈曌.MRCP评价正常人胰胆管十二指肠连接部活动度[J].放射学实践,2005,20(1):48-50. 被引量:1
  • 2巫北海,周代全,蔡萍,等.活体形态学腹盆上卷[M].北京:科学出版社,2006;431-434.
  • 3Hyodo T,Kumano S,Kushihata F,et al. CT and MR eholangiog- raphy:advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree[J].Br J Radiol,2012,85(1015) :887-896.
  • 4Keizman D,Shalom MI,Konikoff FM. An angulated common bile duet predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duet stones after en-doscopic stone extraction[J].Surg Endosc, 2006,20 (10) : 1594-1599.
  • 5Keizman D, Ish Shalom M, Konikoff FM, et al. Recurrent symp- tomatic common bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction in elderly patients[J]. Gastrointest t?.ndosc,2006,64(1):60-65.
  • 6Park JS,Lee DH ,Jeong S,et al. Determination of diameter and an- gulation of the normal common bile duct using muhidetector com- puted tomography[J]. Gut Liver,2009,3(4) :306-310.
  • 7Kim H J, Choi HS, Park J H, et al. Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones[J]. Gastroint- est Endosc,2007,66(6) :1154-1160.
  • 8Andersson M, Kostic S,Johansson M, et al. MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus helical CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected periampullary tumors a prospective comparative study[J].Acta Radiol, 2005,46 (1) : 16-27.
  • 9Tse F, Barkun JS, Romagnuolo J, et al. Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction[J]. HPB (Ox- ford) ,2006,8(6) :409-425.
  • 10孟翔凌,张宗耀.胆总管下段解剖与外科临床[J].普外基础与临床杂志,1997,4(4):228-229. 被引量:14

共引文献12

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部