新发展阶段我国县域全民健身公共服务协同治理的特点、难点与路径

Characteristics,Difficulties and Paths of Collaborative Governance of County-Level Public Services for National Fitness in China in New Development Stage

进入新发展阶段,对我国县域全民健身公共服务协同治理特点的深刻理解决定了共同富裕道路上我国县域构建更高水平全民健身公共服务体系的未来走向。运用文献资料、实证调研等研究方法探究新发展阶段我国县域全民健身公共服务协同治理的特点、难点与路径。研究认为,协同目标的共识性、协同主体的多元性、协同方式的差异性是新发展阶段我国县域全民健身公共服务协同治理的特点。难点:相关政策法规不健全,协同治理难以实现有法可依;治理主体缺少合作,协同治理的体制仍未形成;社会力量参与不足,协同治理难以形成多元共治格局;评估机制不完善,协同治理的评估结果不实用。路径:完善相关法律法规,强化协同治理的制度供给;发挥政府主导作用,完善协同治理的管理体制;深化治理主体改革,优化协同治理的服务机制;发挥第三方评估机构的作用,健全协同治理的评估机制。

The profound understanding of the collaborative governance characteristics of county-level public services for national fitness in new development stage determines the future direction of building a higher-level public service system for national fitness in China’s counties in the process of common prosperity.Through the methods of literature review and empirical research,this study explores the characteristics,difficulties and paths of collaborative governance of county-level public services for national fitness in China in new development stage.It suggests that the consensus of collaborative goals,the diversity of collaborative subjects and the differences in collaborative methods are the characteristics of understanding the collaborative governance of county-level public services for national fitness in new development stage.Difficulties:The relevant policies and regulations are not sound,making it difficult to apply collaborative governance on a legal basis;The cooperation among governance bodies is absent,making the system of collaborative governance unformed;The participation of social forces is insufficient,making collaborative governance hard to form into a diversified co-governance pattern;The evaluation mechanism is incomplete,making the results of collaborative governance unpractical.Paths:Improving relevant laws and regulations to strengthen the institutional supply of collaborative governance;Giving full play to the government’s leading role to improve the management system of collaborative governance;Deepening the reform of governance bodies to optimize the service mechanism of collaborative governance;Playing the role of third-party evaluation agency to improve the evaluation mechanism of collaborative governance.