摘要
目的:探讨血清生物标志物甲胎蛋白(AFP)、维生素K缺失或拮抗剂Ⅱ诱导的蛋白质(PIVKA-Ⅱ)和磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖3(GPC-3)单独或联合用于肝细胞癌(以下简称肝癌)诊断的价值。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase三个数据库,收集2002年以来发表的AFP、PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3单独或联合用于诊断肝癌的文献。根据纳入和排除标准筛选文献并提取相关数据。利用诊断准确性研究的质量评价(QUADAS)检查表对纳入的文献进行质量评价,并采用Meta DiSc软件、Review Manager 5.4软件和Stata 15.1软件对AFP、PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3单用和联合使用诊断肝癌的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度、特异度等指标进行数据分析。结果:共纳入32篇文献。Meta分析结果显示,单个标志物用于诊断肝癌时,PIVKA-Ⅱ的AUC值最高,为0.88(95%CI:0.85~0.91),其次是GPC-3和AFP;多个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌的AUC均高于单个标志物,其中PIVKA-Ⅱ联合GPC-3诊断的AUC值最高,为0.90(95%CI:0.87~0.92)。单个标志物用于诊断肝癌时,PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3的敏感度相对较高(分别为0.75和0.76),但GPC-3的特异度不如PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP(AFP、PIVKA-Ⅱ和GPC-3分别为0.87、0.88和0.81);多个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌的敏感度较单个标志物诊断时有所提高,但特异度无明显提高。单个标志物用于诊断肝癌时,PIVKA-Ⅱ的诊断比值比(DOR)最高,为22(95%CI:13~36),其次是GPC-3和AFP;两个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌的DOR均高于单个标志物,其中AFP联合GPC-3诊断的DOR最高,为25(95%CI:9~67);三个标志物联合用于诊断肝癌时的DOR明显降低,为10(95%CI:7~45)。结论:单个标志物用于肝癌诊断时,PIVKA-Ⅱ的诊断价值更高。两种标志物联合能显著提高肝癌诊断的敏感度,三种标志物联合未能进一步提高诊断价值。结合临床实际,推荐AFP联合PIVKA-Ⅱ用于肝癌的诊断。
Objective:To assess the value of serum alpha-fetoprotein(AFP),protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-Ⅱ(PIVKA-Ⅱ)and glypican-3(GPC-3)in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods:Studies of AFP,PIVKA-Ⅱ,GPC-3 or in combination for the diagnosis of HCC since 2002 were searched in PubMed,Web of Science and Embase databases.The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,the quality of the included articles was evaluated by QUADAS checklist,and relevant data were extracted by Meta DiSc,Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1.The diagnostic values of AFP,PIVKA-Ⅱand GPC-3 alone or in combination for HCC were assessed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results:A total of 32 articles were included in the study.Meta-analysis showed that when a single marker was used to diagnose HCC,the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of PIVKA-Ⅱwas the highest(0.88,95%CI:0.85-0.91),followed by GPC-3 and AFP.The AUC of combination of serum markers was higher than that of a single marker,and the AUC of PIVKA-Ⅱcombined with GPC-3 was the highest(0.90,95%CI:0.87-0.92).When a single marker was used for diagnosis,the sensitivity of PIVKA-Ⅱand GPC-3 were relatively high(0.75 and 0.76),while the specificity of PIVKA-Ⅱ(0.88)and AFP(0.87)were higher than that of GPC-3(0.81).The sensitivity of the combination of serum markers was higher than that of a single marker,while the specificity was not significantly improved.When a single marker is used to diagnose HCC,the diagnostic odds ratio(DOR)of PIVKA-Ⅱwas the highest(22,95%CI:13-36),followed by GPC-3 and AFP.The DOR of the combination of two markers in the diagnosis of HCC was higher than that of a single marker,and the DOR of AFP combined with GPC-3 was the highest(25,95%CI:9-67).The DOR of the combination of the three markers was significantly reduced to 10(95%CI:7-45).Conclusions:When a single marker is used,PIVKA-Ⅱhas a higher diagnostic value for HCC.The combination of two markers can significantly improve the diagnostic sensitivity,and AFP combined with PIVKA-Ⅱis recommended for the diagnosis of HCC.The combination of all three markers failed to further improve the diagnostic value.
作者
宋红亮
王建国
张会
吴勇锋
汪恺
王晓波
徐骁
SONG Hongliang;WANG Jianguo;ZHANG Hui;WU Yongfeng;WANG Kai;WANG Xiaobo;XU Xiao(The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University,Hangzhou 310053,China;Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory ofIntegrated Oncology and Intelligent Medicine,Hangzhou 310003,China)
出处
《浙江大学学报(医学版)》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第1期131-139,共9页
Journal of Zhejiang University(Medical Sciences)
基金
浙江省重点研发计划(2019C03050)。