《画史会要》“朱谋垔托名说”辨误

The Author of Hua Shi Hui Yao should be Zhu Mouyin

《画史会要》是考索明代画家的重要文献,然其编者为明人朱谋垔抑或金赉,尚存疑议。本文通过比勘署名不同的两种《画史会要》版本,同时考察朱谋垔编刊美术文献的历程,认为朱谋垔编纂《画史会要》有案可稽,金赉则为好事者虚造之乌有先生。进而对莫伯骥、谢巍辨伪过度的原因进行分析,于书画文献辨伪之方法亦略献刍荛。

Hua Shi Hui Yao is an important reference book for the study of the historical data of Ming Dynasty painters,but it is worth investigating whether the editor of this book is Zhu Mouyin or Jin Lai in the Ming Dynasty.This paper investigates the editor of the book from two aspects: the comparison of two versions of Hua Shi Hui Yao with different signatures, the history of Zhu Mouyin's compilation and printing of fine arts literature. It is believed that there are many evidences that Zhu Mouyin compiled the Summary of the History of Painting, and Jin Lai should be a fictitious figure. In addition, the errors made by Mo Boji and Xie Wei have been analyzed, and the methods for identifying the authenticity of painting and calligraphy literature have also been put forward.