期刊文献+

Distal margin distance in radical resection of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Colorectal cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate in China, with the majority of cases being middle and low rectal cancer. Surgical intervention is currently the main treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer, with the common goal of improving oncological outcomes while preserving function. The controversy regarding the circumferential resection margin distance in rectal cancer surgery has been resolved. With the promotion of neoadjuvant therapy concepts and advancements in technology, treatment strategies have become more diverse.Following tumor downstaging, there is an increasing trend towards extending the safe distance of distal rectal margin. This provides more opportunities for patients with low rectal cancer to preserve their anal function.However, there is currently no consensus on the specific distance of distal resection margin.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2024年第2期226-232,共7页 中国癌症研究(英文版)
基金 supported by “San Ming” Project of Shenzhen, China (No. SZSM201612051) National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81972240)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1Whitefnrd MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL. Feasibility of radicalsigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal en-doscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsur-gery [j]. Surg Endoso,2007,21(10): 1870-1874.
  • 2Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, et al. NOTES transanal rentalcancer reRer'tion using transanal endoftcopic* microsurgery andlaparoscopic assistance [j]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(5):1205-1210.
  • 3Heald RJ. A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME[J]..Tech Coloproctol,2013,17(3):257-258.
  • 4Aigner F, Hormann R, Fritseh H,et al. Anatomical consider-ations for transanal minimal-invasive surgery: the eaudal to ce-phalic approach [j]. Colorectal Dis, 2014, 23. doi: 10.1111/co-di. 12846. [Epuh ahead of print].
  • 5Bertrand MM,Colombo PE,Alsaid B,et al. Transanal endoscop-ic proctectomy and nerve injury risk:bottom to top surgical anat-omy, key points[j]. Dis Colon Rectum,2014,57(9): 1145-1148.
  • 6Garc\a-Armengol J, Garc 1 a-Botello S, Martinez-Soriano F, etal. Review of the anatomic concepts in relation to the retrorectalspace and endopelvic fascia: Waldeyer' s fascia and the rectosa-eral fasoia[j]. Colorectal Dis,2008,10(3):298-302.
  • 7A car HIB, Kuzu AM. Perineal and Pelvic Anatomy of extraleva-tor abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: cadaveric dis—section[j]. Dis Colon Rectum,2011,54(9) : 1179-1183.
  • 8Hasegawa S, Nagayama S,Nomura A, et al. Multimedia article.Autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision in the lap-aroscopic era[j]. Dis Colon Rectum,2008,51(8): 1279-1282.
  • 9Rink AD, Kneist W, Radinski I,et al. Differences in ano-neo-rectal physiology of ileoanal and roloanal reconstnictions for re-storative proctectomy [j]. Colorectal Dis, 2010,12(4) : 342—350.
  • 10Kneist W,Rink AD,Kauff DW, et al. Topography of the extrin-sic internal anal sphincter nerve supply during laparoscop-ic—assisted TAMIS TME: five key zones of risk from the sur-geons 5 view[j]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2015,30( 1):71-78.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部