期刊文献+

基于重要性—绩效的公共交通服务质量满意度分析

Satisfaction of Public Transport Service Quality and Improvement Strategies Based on Importance-Performance Matrix
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于顾客满意度模型,挖掘政府购买服务背景下的公交满意度影响机理,从硬件(产品满意度)和软件(服务满意度)两维度构建公共交通满意评价体系;其次,利用结构方程模型确定各公交服务属性在预测整体满意度方面的重要性,采用重要性—绩效分析方法确定公共交通满意度指标的改善优先级;最后,以北京某区为例进行实证。结果显示,公共交通软件(服务满意度)的相对重要性高于硬件(产品满意度),采用重要性-绩效分析方法识别公共交通满意度属性的改善优先级,制定并实施改进策略后,满意度提升9.9%。研究为政府购买服务背景下的公共交通服务水平提升、政策建议和策略制定提供理论支撑。 Based on the customer satisfaction model,the influence mechanism of satisfaction under the background of government s purchasing public transportation service is explored,and the public transportation satisfaction evaluation system is constructed from two dimensions:hardware(product satisfaction)and software(service satisfaction).Secondly,the structural equation model is used to determine the importance of each public transportation service attribute in predicting the overall satisfaction,and the an Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA)is applied to determine the improvement priorities of the public transport satisfaction indicators.Finally,a case study about a district in Beijing is taken.The results reveal that the importance of software(service satisfaction of public transportation)is higher than that of hardware(product satisfaction of public transportation).Based on the IPA method,the improvement priorities of public transport satisfaction are identified.By formulating and implementing the improvement and promotion strategies,the satisfaction increased by 9.9%,which indicated that our research can provide theoretical support for the improvement of public transport service level in the context of government purchase of services,policy recommendations and strategy formulation.
作者 韩艳 赵昊 果林峰 袁昌银 王宇晨 HAN Yan;ZHAO Hao;GUO Linfeng;YUAN Changyin;WANG Yuchen(Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China;Laboratory of Transport Safety and Emergency Technology Transport Planning and Research Institute,Beijing 100028,China)
出处 《交通工程》 2024年第6期34-40,共7页 Journal of Transportation Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(71971005)。
关键词 城市公共交通 公共交通服务质量 重要性-绩效矩阵 满意度评价 政府购买服务 顾客满意度理论 urban public transportation bus services quality importance-performance matrix satisfaction evaluation government s purchasing healthcare service customer satisfaction theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1邵祖峰.城市公共交通服务质量评价神经网络模型[J].城市管理与科技,2005,7(4):178-180. 被引量:14
  • 2李煜华,胡运权.灰色聚类法在城市公共交通发展水平评价中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2006,36(2):125-132. 被引量:26
  • 3雒应,叶亚丽.大中城市交通体系建设可持续发展[J].中外公路,2006,26(4):221-223. 被引量:2
  • 4Pauhus. D.L. and Lim. D. T.K. Arousal and Evaluative Extremity in Social Judgements-A Dynamic Complexity Model[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1994, 24(1) :88-99.
  • 5Claes Fomell. A National Customer Satisfaction Barorneter: The Swedish Experience[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1992,5G(1) :6-21.
  • 6Claes Fomell and Michael D. Johnson. Differentiation as a Basis for Explaining Customer Satisfaction Across Industries[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1993, 14 (4) :681-696.
  • 7Fornell, Claes, The Sciences of Satisfaction[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2001,79 (3) : 120-121.
  • 8Anderson, Eugene W. Claes Fomell and Roland T. Rust. Customer Satisfaction, Productivity and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services[J]. Marketing Science,R. 1997,16(2) :129-145.
  • 9Anderson, Eugene W. and Claes Fomell. Foundations of the American Customer Satisfaction Index[J]. Journal of Total Quality Measurement. 2000, 11(7) :869-882.
  • 10Gustafsson, Anders and Michael D. Johnson. Bridging the Quality--Satisfaction Gap [J]. Quality Management Journal,1997,4(3):27-43

共引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部