期刊文献+

Classification and rating of disintegrated dolomite strata for slope stability analysis

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Although disintegrated dolomite,widely distributed across the globe,has conventionally been a focus of research in underground engineering,the issue of slope stability issues in disintegrated dolomite strata is gaining increasing prominence.This is primarily due to their unique properties,including low strength and loose structure.Current methods for evaluating slope stability,such as basic quality(BQ)and slope stability probability classification(SSPC),do not adequately account for the poor integrity and structural fragmentation characteristic of disintegrated dolomite.To address this challenge,an analysis of the applicability of the limit equilibrium method(LEM),BQ,and SSPC methods was conducted on eight disintegrated dolomite slopes located in Baoshan,Southwest China.However,conflicting results were obtained.Therefore,this paper introduces a novel method,SMRDDS,to provide rapid and accurate assessment of disintegrated dolomite slope stability.This method incorporates parameters such as disintegrated grade,joint state,groundwater conditions,and excavation methods.The findings reveal that six slopes exhibit stability,while two are considered partially unstable.Notably,the proposed method demonstrates a closer match with the actual conditions and is more time-efficient compared with the BQ and SSPC methods.However,due to the limited research on disintegrated dolomite slopes,the results of the SMRDDS method tend to be conservative as a safety precaution.In conclusion,the SMRDDS method can quickly evaluate the current situation of disintegrated dolomite slopes in the field.This contributes significantly to disaster risk reduction for disintegrated dolomite slopes.
出处 《Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering》 SCIE CSCD 2024年第7期2552-2562,共11页 岩石力学与岩土工程学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.42162026) the Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province(Grant No.202201AT070083).
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1曾勇胜.工民建深基坑开挖与边坡支护施工技术探讨[J].智能城市,2021(4):154-155. 被引量:8
  • 2臧泽光,刘记帅,王强,刘阳.不同放坡开挖工况下基坑边坡稳定性对比研究[J].隧道与轨道交通,2021(S01):122-124. 被引量:2
  • 3郭松峰,祁生文,黄晓林.岩体强度各向异性及其转化的应力条件[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(S2):3222-3227. 被引量:5
  • 4Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering r0ck mass classificati0ns. Wiley, New Y0rk, USA. p 251.
  • 5Biiyiikutku AG (2003) The reserv0ir p0tential 0f Mi0cene carb0nate r0cks in the Askale and Hmls-Mu-Van sub-basins, East Anat0lia, Turkey. J0urnal 0f Petr0leum Ge0l0gy 26(2): 175-188.
  • 6Chen Z (1995) Recent devel0pments in sl0pe stability analysis. In: Pr0ceedings 0f the 8th Internati0nal C0ngress ISRM, T0ky0, Japan. pp. lO41-1048.
  • 7Das I, Sah00 S, van Westen C, et al. (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment using l0gistic regressi0n and its c0mparis0n with a r0ck mass classificati0n system, al0ng a r0ad secti0n in the n0rthern Himalayas (India). Ge0m0rph0l0gy 114: 627-637. DOI: 1O.lO16/j.ge0m0rph.2009. 09.023.
  • 8Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classificati0n and index pr0perties f0r intact r0ck. Technical Rep0rt N0. AFNL- TR-65-116, Air F0rce Weap0ns Lab0rat0ry, New Mexic0.
  • 9Demirtall E, Pis0ni C (1965) The ge0l0gy 0f Ahlat-Adilcevaz area, N0rth 0f Lake Van. Bulletin 0f the Mineral Research and Expl0rati0n Institute 0f Turkey 64: 22-35.
  • 10Duzgun HSB, Bhasin RK (2009) Pr0babilistic stability evaluati0n 0f Oppstadh0rnet r0ck sl0pe, N0rway. R0ck Mechanics and R0ck Engineering 42: 729-749. DOI: lO.lOO7/ s00603-008-0011-3.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部