期刊文献+

改良腹膜外腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除+回肠膀胱术的临床应用

Clinical application of modified extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹膜外入路腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除+回肠膀胱术(Bricker术)的可行性及安全性。方法:选择2020年3月至2023年12月收治的42例肌层浸润性膀胱癌男性患者作为观察组,60~84岁,平均(69.2±4.9)岁,行腹膜外入路腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术,延长正中切口约5 cm取出标本,再行Bricker术,将回肠袢完全隔离于腹腔外。选择同期同一术者团队开展的38例经腹腔入路腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除+回肠膀胱术作为对照组,比较两组手术时间、出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、术后肠功能恢复时间、肠梗阻等并发症及切口愈合情况。结果:观察组手术均获成功,无中转开腹。观察组与对照组腹腔镜阶段手术时间[(172.3±25.5)min vs.(172.1±27.4)min]、出血量[(194.5±100.5)mL vs.(207.6±107.8)mL]、淋巴结清扫数量[(11.6±2.9)枚vs.(11.8±2.7)枚]差异无统计学意义,观察组与对照组术后肠功能恢复时间[(2.2±0.4)d vs.(3.4±0.6)d,P<0.05]、肠梗阻例数(0 vs.7,P<0.01)、切口愈合不良(1 vs.9,P<0.01)差异有统计学意义。结论:经腹膜外入路腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除+回肠膀胱术是安全、可靠的,利用膀胱位于腹膜外及腹膜天然屏障的特点,改良手术入路将回肠袢、输尿管吻合口完全置于腹膜外,可减少肠梗阻的发生,术后肠功能恢复快,切口感染率低,值得临床推广应用。 Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy(ELRC)with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion(Bricker surgery).Methods:From Mar.2020 to Dec.2023,a total of 42 male patients,aged between 60 and 84 years old,who underwent ELRC and were diagnosed with muscle invasive bladder cancer,were included in the study as observation group.The average age was(69.2±4.9)years.The median incision was approximately extended to 5 cm in order to extract the specimen.Bricker surgery was performed after specimen extraction,the loop of the ileum was completely i solated from the abdominal cavity.In addition,38 patients who underwent transabdominal laparoscopic radical cystectomy and Bricker surgery by the same surgeon team from Mar.2020 to Dec.2023 were considered as the control group.And the two groups were compared in terms of operation time,blood loss,number of lymph nodes dissection,postoperative intestinal function recovery time,intestinal o bstruction and incision healing.Results:All 42 patients in the observation group were successfully operated,and no cases were converted to laparotomy.In observation group and control group,there were no significant differences in operative time of laparoscopic stage[(172.3±25.5)min vs.(172.1±27.4)min],blood loss[(194.5±100.5)mL vs.(207.6±107.8)mL],number of lymph node harvested[(11.6±2.9)vs.(11.8±2.7)],there were statistically significant differences in postoperative intestinal function recovery time[(2.2±0.4)d vs.(3.4±0.6)d,P<0.05],incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction(0 vs.7,P<0.01)and incision u ndesirable healing(1 vs.9,P<0.01).Conclusions:ELRC with Bricker operation is safe and reliable,and takes advantage of the extraperitoneal location of the bladder and the natural barrier provided by the peritoneum,this improved surgical approach completely positions the ileal loop and ureteral anastomosis outside the peritoneum,resulting in a significant reduction in intestinal obstruction and incisional infection rate,and quick r ecovery of postoperative intestinal function.This procedure is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
作者 熊丙建 陶光晶 谢蛟魁 余义 王晓 李均 邱明皓 江铎 XIONG Bingjian;TAO Guangjing;XIE Jiaokui(Department of Urology,Ankang Central Hospital,Ankang 725000,China)
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2024年第7期526-531,537,共7页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
基金 陕西省安康市科技局科研计划项目(AK2022-SF-10)。
关键词 膀胱肿瘤 腹膜外 膀胱根治性切除术 尿流改道术 腹腔镜检查 Urinary bladder neoplasms Extraperitoneal Radical cystectomy Urinary diversion Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘天琦,张振辉,刘豪圣,方建雄,赵超,刘久敏,蒲小勇.腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中完全腹膜外经皮输尿管造口术[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(2):169-172. 被引量:1
  • 2隋元明,邢念增,张宗亮,赵凯,王振林,张玉莲,赵海卫,李晨,李雪禹,张学宝,郭珈铭,种丽强,牛海涛,王科.加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜膀胱全切回肠原位膀胱术围手术期的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2021(1):45-49. 被引量:5
  • 3A. Karim Kader,Kyle A. Richards,L. Spencer Krane,Joseph A. Pettus,John J. Smith,Ashok K. Hemal.Robot‐assisted laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy: comparison of complications and perioperative oncological outcomes in 200 patients[J]. BJU Int . 2013 (4)
  • 4Ben J. Challacombe,Bernard H. Bochner,Prokar Dasgupta,Inderbir Gill,Khurshid Guru,Harry Herr,Alexander Mottrie,Raj Pruthi,Joan Palou Redorta,Peter Wiklund.The Role of Laparoscopic and Robotic Cystectomy in the Management of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With Special Emphasis on Cancer Control and Complications[J]. European Urology . 2011 (4)
  • 5Amr F. Fergany,Inderbir S. Gill.Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy[J]. Urologic Clinics of North America . 2008 (3)
  • 6Hermans T J,Fossion L M.Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical cystectomywithout neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with a median follow-up of32months. Urologia Internationalis . 2014
  • 7Caras RJ,Lustik MB,Kern SQ,et al.Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy demonstrates less morbidity than open radicalprostatectomy:an analysis of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database with a focus on surgical trainee involvement. Journal of Endourology . 2014
  • 8蒋书算,曾福华,韩惟青,谢宇,刘志中,莫曾南.腹腔镜与开放手术行根治性膀胱切除的对照研究[J].现代肿瘤医学,2013,21(11):2541-2543. 被引量:8
  • 9刘路浩,张涛,何书华,吴子云,张海波,陈逢志,韦安阳.经腹腔与经腹膜外途径腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术疗效比较的Meta分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2013,19(11):1020-1026. 被引量:26
  • 10戴波,常坤,瞿元元,孔蕴毅,王朝夫,叶定伟,张海梁,杨唯一.腹膜外腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术106例报告[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2014,19(9):589-593. 被引量:21

共引文献1477

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部