期刊文献+

中国社会科学生产方式:来自教育财政领域的观察

Production Mode of Social Sciences in China:Observations from the Field of Education Finance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文首先提出了我国社会科学生产方式的体制学和动力学分析的概念,在此基础上提出一个“四性混合”即涵盖政治性功能、行政性治理、学术性策略和技术性条件的分析框架,继而应用此框架分析了历史上发生的3个真实研究事件——也即“4%政策目标”提出背后的研究事件、与“4%政策目标”相关的公共教育支出统计可比性研究和一个关于公共教育支出占GDP比例的国际文献综述研究——以阐明我国教育财政研究的知识生产过程的影响因素。本文最后讨论了关于中国教育财政研究的自主知识体系构建和研究范式问题的初步思考。 This paper first proposes the concept of institutional and dynamic analysis of the production mode of social sciences in China,and on this basis proposes a“four-dimension hybrid”analytical framework that covers political functions,administrative governance,academic strategies,and technical conditions.This framework is then used to analyze three real research events that took place in history—namely,the research event behind the“four percent of GDP”policy,which is the most important educational finance research event in recent history of China,the statistical comparability study of public education expenditures,and an international literature review study re-lated to the“four percent of GDP”policy—to elaborate on the above influencing factors.Finally,some preliminary thoughts are discussed on the construction of an independent knowledge system and research paradigm issues in China’s education finance research.
作者 王蓉 Wang Rong(China Institute of Education Financial Science/Research Center for Future Education Management,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第11期111-126,共16页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
关键词 社会科学 生产方式 教育财政 4%政策目标 social science mode of production education finance “four percent of GDP”policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献99

  • 1Ellen Immergut, Health Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • 2George Tsebelis, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
  • 3George Tsebelis, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, pp. 19-20.
  • 4Helen Milner, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997, pp. 74, 237.
  • 5Gerard Alexander, "Institutions, Path Dependence, and Democratic Consolidation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2001, pp. 249-270.
  • 6Daniel Drezner, ed. , Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003, p. 16.
  • 7G. John Ikenberry, David Lake, and Michael Mastanduno, "Introduction: Approaches to Explaining American Foreign Eonomic Policy," International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1988, p. 13.
  • 8Andrew Moravcsik, "Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation," Center for European Studies at Harvard University, Working Paper Series #52, 1994, p. 7.
  • 9Andrew Moravesik, "Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation," pp. 8-14.
  • 10Norrin Ripsman, Peacemaking by Democracies: The Effect of State Autonomy on the Post-World War Settlemenu, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002, pp. 58-59.

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部