期刊文献+

Evaluating the characteristics of geological structures in karst groundwater inflow, Nowsud Tunnel

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Highly permeable geological structures such as dissolution channels, open fractures, and faults create environmental challenges regard to hydrological and hydrogeological aspects of underground construction, often causing significant groundwater inflow during drilling due to the limitations of empirical and analytical methods. This study aims to identify the geological factors influencing water flow into the tunnel. High-flow zones' geological features have been identified and examined for this purpose. According to the geological complexity of the Nowsud tunnel, presence of different formations with different permeability and karstification have led to a high volume of underground inflow water (up to 4700 L/s) to the tunnel. The Nowsud tunnel faces significant geological and hydrogeological challenges due to its passage through the Ilam formation's LI2 unit, characterized by dissolution channels, faults, and fractures. The highest inflow rate (4700 L/s) occurred in the Hz-9 zone within the Zimkan anticline. The relationship between geological features and groundwater inflow indicates that anticlines are more susceptible to inflow than synclines. Additionally, different types of faults exhibit varying hydraulic effects, with strike-slip faults having the most significant impact on groundwater inflow, thrust faults conducting less water into the tunnel, and inflow through normal faults being negligible compared to the other two types of faults. The novelty of this paper lies in its detailed analysis of geological features influencing groundwater inflow into the Nowsud tunnel, providing empirical data on high-flow zones and differentiating the hydraulic effects of various fault types, which enhances the understanding and prediction of groundwater inflow in underground constructions.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2024年第10期3434-3452,共19页 山地科学学报(英文)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithankar AG. Tunnelling through the young Himalayas-a case history of the Maneri-Uttarkashi power tunnel. Eng Geol 1995;39:31-44.
  • 2Auden JB. Geological investigations of tunnel alignment for the Yamuna hydroelectric scheme. Rec Geol Surv 1942;2:77.
  • 3Jain MS, Andotra BS, Sondhi SN. Note on the geological features of the Chhibro-Khodri tunnel and occurrences of Subathu Shales. Unpubl: Unpubl Rep Geol Surv, 1975.
  • 4Dube AK. Geomechanical evaluation of tunnel stability under failing rock conditions in a Himalayan tunnel. Dept of Civil Eng 1979;2:212.
  • 5Rao RS, Sharma KK. A case study of soft soil tunnelling with DRESS methodology in Rohtang tunnel construction. In: Proc National Seminar on Innovative Practices in Rock Mechanics, Bengaluru, India, 2014:184-190.
  • 6Goel RK, Dwivedi RD, Viswanathan G, Rathore JS. Monitoring of a tunnel through mixed geology in the Himalaya. In: World Tunnel Congress 2013, Geneva, 2013:2115-2122.
  • 7Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 1974;6:189-236.
  • 8Bieniawski 7T. Rock mechanics design in mining and tunnelling. Rotterdam: A A Balkema; 1994. p. 97-133.
  • 9Marinos P, Hoek E. Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as Flysch. Bull Engg Geol Env 2001 ;60:85-92.
  • 10Singh B, Goel RK. Rock mass classification: a practical approach in civil engineering. Elsevier Science; 1999. 268.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部