期刊文献+

Comparative study on the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery and non-robotic surgery for tongue base tumors

经口机器人与非机器人手术治疗舌根肿瘤的疗效对比
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective:To compare the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery(TORS)and non-robotic surgery(NRS)in the treatment of tongue base tumors.Methods:A total of 45 patients with tongue base tumors treated in our hospital were selected,and they were divided into the TORS group and NRS group according to different surgical methods.The surgical indicators and postoperative complications of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results:Compared with the NRS group,the operative time,bleeding volume and length of hospital stay were less in the TORS group,and the postoperative recurrence rate was less in the TORS group than that in the NRS group.The incidence rate of dysphagia and restricted mouth opening in the TORS group was lower than that in the NRS group within 30 d after surgery,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:TORS has better minimally invasive advantages in the treatment of tongue base tumors,including less intraoperative bleeding,smaller trauma,shorter length of hospital stay and faster recovery. 目的:比较经口机器人手术(TORS)与非机器人手术(NRS)治疗舌根肿瘤的疗效。方法:根据手术方式不同,将45例舌根肿瘤患者分为TORS组(n=19)和NRS组(n=26),对比分析两组患者的手术指标及术后并发症情况。结果:与NRS组相比,TORS组手术时间更短、出血量更少、术后住院天数更短,术后复发率更低。术后30 d内,NRS组患者吞咽困难、开口受限等并发症发生率高于TORS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:TORS治疗舌根肿瘤具有术中出血少、损伤小、术后住院时间短、术后恢复快等微创优势。
作者 YU Wenjun LIN Quanquan FENG Lin ZHANG Haizhong XI Qing 于文俊;林权泉;冯琳;张海钟;席庆(解放军总医院第一医学中心口腔科,北京100853)
出处 《机器人外科学杂志(中英文)》 2024年第5期952-958,共7页 Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery
基金 军队课题(LB201211AO10038)。
关键词 Tongue Base Tumor Transoral Robotic Surgery Non-robotic Surgery Minimally Invasive Surgery EFFICACY COMPLICATION 舌根肿瘤 经口机器人手术 非机器人手术 微创外科 疗效 并发症
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献
;
使用帮助 返回顶部