期刊文献+

The Synthetic Evaluation of Warhead Overall Efficiency 被引量:3

The Synthetic Evaluation of Warhead Overall Efficiency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The evaluation system of smart ammunition warhead overall efficiency has been established in this paper. Allkinds of evaluation methods have been analyzed. Having led the concept of hierarchical structure into technique for orderpreference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, we put forward the step TOPSIS method which is suitable forevaluating the overall efficiency of smart ammunition warheads. In the calculation of index weight, the graded weight cal-culus is put forward which hardly relies on the subjectivity of decision-makers and can reflect the sensitivity and compatibili-ty of the index. In the graded weight calculation, the proportional-arithmetic weight value calculus and sensitivity-compati-bility weight value calculus are given respectively. The evaluation system of smart ammunition warhead overall efficiency has been established in this paper. All kinds of evaluation methods have been analyzed. Having led the concept of hierarchical structure into technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, we put forward the step TOPSIS method which is suitable for evaluating the overall efficiency of smart ammunition warheads. In the calculation of index weight, the graded weight calculus is put forward which hardly relies on the subjectivity of decision-makers and can reflect the sensitivity and compatibility of the index. In the graded weight calculation, the proportional-arithmetic weight value calculus and sensitivity-compatibility weight value calculus are given respectively.
出处 《Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics》 SCIE EI CSCD 2003年第1期12-17,共6页 系统工程与电子技术(英文版)
关键词 Step analysis TOPSIS method WARHEAD Efficiency evaluation. Step analysis, TOPSIS method, Warhead, Efficiency evaluation.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

  • 1董志荣 苗艳 李艳丽.目标定位和跟踪的卡尔曼滤波加BP神经网络的方法[J].火力与指挥控制,1998,23(1):19-30.
  • 2[2]陈延.决策分析.北京:科学出版社,1987
  • 3[4]Hwang C L,Yoon K S.Multiple attribute decision making springer-verlag.Berlin,1981
  • 4[5]Satty T L.The analytic hierarchy process.planning,priority setting,resource allocation.Mc-Graw-Hill,New York,1980
  • 5陈埏.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987..
  • 6刘铭,刘毅静.战术导弹武器系统效能研究[J].弹箭与制导学报,1999,19(3):47-53. 被引量:8

共引文献4

同被引文献21

  • 1顾晓辉,王晓鸣,赵有守.灰色层次评估法在智能雷战斗部总体效能评估中的应用[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2002,16(2):51-55. 被引量:2
  • 2李静海.防空导弹战斗部性能分析及发展趋势[J].地面防空武器,2005(1):25-28. 被引量:3
  • 3胡勇,唐雪梅.TBM突防能力评估方法[J].现代防御技术,2005,33(3):39-42. 被引量:8
  • 4顾晓辉 王晓鸣 赵有守.灰色系统的弹箭系统研制费用估计模型的研究[J].南京理工大学学报,2001,25(2):117-120.
  • 5唐雪梅.地地弹道导弹武器系统攻防体系对抗[J].系统工程与电子技术,2000,(10):10-13.
  • 6Ones N W. Application of simulation to the evolution of weapon system performanee[C]//1986 Summer computer sim- ulation conference. Paris: Kigil Nide, 1986: 17-23.
  • 7Li W, Mao N, Pan W. The effectiveness evaluation model of radar jamming system based on WSEIAC model[C]//Con- trol and decision conference 2008. Yantai: IEEE press, 2008: 1848-1852.
  • 8Brockel K H,Cofield D,DeALLsume W, et al. Electromagnetic environment effects compendium [R]. Research and de- velopment technical report,CECOM-TR-93-5,1993 : 1-20.
  • 9姜科.防空反导导弹战斗部研制方案评价模型研究[D].西安:空军工程大学,2011.
  • 10徐学华,徐翔.弹药系统工程基础[M].北京:兵器工业出版社,2006.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部