期刊文献+

中美社会企业法律规制比较研究及对中国的启示 被引量:3

A Comparative Analysis on the Social Enterprise Legislation between the United States and China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着社会企业运动的不断深化,美国各州出现了以共益公司制度为代表的一系列新型法律形式。以企业目的、可问责性和透明度标准为主要内容的共益公司制度是对当下市场需求的回应,能够满足消费者、投资者、政策制定者和社会企业的多重需求,与其他组织形式相比具有独特的优势和价值。共益公司立法反映了社会治理模式的深层变革,是现代治理理论的具体实践和体现,对完善我国社会企业法律制度具有重要参考意义。强化治理结构和问责机制,通过影响力评估标准发挥外部市场规制是健全我国社会企业制度的关键。 As a result of the social enterprise movement,different states in the U. S. have introduced a series of new legis-lations,and benefit corporation law is the typical example which attracts a lot of attention. Focus on the mission of socialenterprises,the accountability and the requirements on transparency,this new legal form of benefit corporation is an betteranswer to the variable demands of consumers,investors,policy makers and the social entrepreneurship itself,which con-tributes unique values and advantages compared to other existing legal forms. As a new tool under the theory of new govern-ance,social enterprise law gives way to reflexive rules that allow for flexibility and adaptability in the face of changing phe-nomena. While this wave of social enterprises is reaching China,it is vital to build a legal framework to promote the move-ment,especially in establishing an accountability mechanism under the existing Chinese laws,which can be achieved by re-sorting to two tools:internal corporate governance and external market discipline.
作者 郑夏蕾
出处 《科学.经济.社会》 2015年第3期126-131,共6页 Science Economy Society
关键词 社会企业立法 共益公司 治理理论 影响力评估 social enterprise legislation benefit corporation new governance impact measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Joseph W.Yockey.Does social enterprise law matter?. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2389024 .
  • 2Model Legislation for Benefit Corporation. http://benefitcorp.net .
  • 3Benefit Corporation White Paper. http://benefitcorp.net .
  • 4Cone Communications Cone Cause Evolution&Environment; Survey. Cone Research Report 8 . 2007
  • 5Cone Communications 2010 Cone Cause Evolution Study. Cone Research Report 10 . 2010
  • 6Klaus J Hopt,Thomas Von Hippel.Comparative Corporate Governance of Non-Profit Organizations. . 2010
  • 7Hui Huang.Shareholder Derivative Litigation in China:Empirical Findings and Comparative Analysis. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2140613 .
  • 8ISO and developing countries. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/about/iso-and-developing-countries.htm .

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部