期刊文献+

INFLUENCES OF DENSITY AND DIMENSION OF CARBON NANOTUBES ON THEIR FIELD EMISSION

INFLUENCES OF DENSITY AND DIMENSION OF CARBON NANOTUBES ON THEIR FIELD EMISSION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The influences of density and dimension of carbon nanotubes on their electron emission from arrays are studied. The tip electric field of nanotubes, electric field enhancement factor, and optimum nanotube density are expressed by analytic equations. The theoretical analyses show that the field enhancement factor is sensitive to nanotube density, and can be sharply improved at a specific and optimum density. Some experiments have demonstrated these. Owning to electrostatic screening effect, the length of carbon nanotubes has little effect on their emission. A uniformly-distributed carbon nanotube array model is set up, and applied to analysis of carbon nanotube arrays. The results obtained here are in good agreement with the experimental data. The influences of density and dimension of carbon nanotubes on their electron emission from arrays are studied. The tip electric field of nanotubes, electric field enhancement factor, and optimum nanotube density are expressed by analytic equations. The theoretical analyses show that the field enhancement factor is sensitive to nanotube density, and can be sharply improved at a specific and optimum density. Some experiments have demonstrated these. Owning to electrostatic screening effect, the length of carbon nanotubes has little effect on their emission. A uniformly-distributed carbon nanotube array model is set up, and applied to analysis of carbon nanotube arrays. The results obtained here are in good agreement with the experimental data.
出处 《Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English Letters)》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2003年第4期302-308,共7页 金属学报(英文版)
关键词 carbon nanotube array field emission optimum density carbon nanotube array, field emission, optimum density
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1A. Grail, J. Han and S.B. Sinnott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(11) (1998) 2260.
  • 2J.P. Salvetat, J.M. Bonard, N.H. Thomson, A.T. Kulik, L: Forro,W. Benoit and L. Zuppiroli, Appl.Phys. A 69 (1999) 255.
  • 3S.J. Tan, A.R.M. Verschueren and C. Dekker, Nature 393 (1998) 49.
  • 4A.Y. Kasumov, R. Deblock, M. Kociak, B. Reulet, H. Bouchiat, I.I. Khodos, Y.B. Gorbatov, V.T.Volkov, C. Journet and M. Burghard, Science 284 (1999) 1508.
  • 5J.M. Bonard, T. Stockli, F. Maier, W.A. de Heer, A. Chatelain, J.P. Salvetat and L. Forro, Phys. Rev.Lett. 81(7) (1998) 1441.
  • 6J.M. Bonard, J.P. Salvetat, T. Stockli, L. Forro and A. Chatelain, Appl. Phys. A 69 (1999) 245.
  • 7Y. Saito, K. Hamaguchi, S. Uemura, K. Uchida, Y. Tasaka, F. Ikazaki; M. Yumura; A: Kasuya and Y.Nishina, Appl. Phys. A 67 (1998) 95.
  • 8D.N. Davydov, P.A. Sattari, D.A.AIMawlawi, A. Osika, T.L. Haslett and M. Moskovits, J. Appl. Phys.86(7) (1999) 3983.
  • 9C.W.Wang,M.K. Li and H.L. Li, Science in China A 30(11) (2000) 1019.
  • 10S. Fan, M.G. Chapline, N.R. Franklin, T.W. Tombler, A.M. Cassell and H. Dai, Science 283 (1999)512.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部