期刊文献+

Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: State of art 被引量:16

Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: State of art
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection provides the same oncologic results as open surgery along with all clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery. During the last years, a great effort has been made to research for minimizing parietal trauma, yet for cosmetic reasons and in order to further reduce surgery-related pain and morbidity. New techniques, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) have been developed in order to reach the goal of “scarless” surgery. Although NOTES may seem not fully suitable or safe for advanced procedures, such as colectomies, SIL is currently regarded as the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use. The small incision through the umbilicus allows surgeons to use familiar standard laparoscopic instruments and thus, perform even complex procedures which require extraction of large surgical specimens or intestinal anastomosis. The cosmetic result from SIL is also better because the only incision is made through the umbilicus which can hide the wound effectively after operation. However, SIL raises a number of specific new challenges compared with the laparoscopic conventional approach. A reduced capacity for triangulation, the repeated conflicts between the shafts of the instruments and the difficulties to achieve a correct exposure of the operative field are the most claimed issues. The use therefore of this new approach for complex colorectal procedures might understandingly be viewed as difficult to implement, especially for oncologic cases. A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection provides the same oncologic results as open surgery along with all clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery.During the last years,a great effort has been made to research for minimizing parietal trauma,yet for cosmetic reasons and in order to further reduce surgery-related pain and morbidity.New techniques,such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)and single-incision laparoscopy(SIL)have been developed in order to reach the goal of"scarless"surgery.Although NOTES may seem not fully suitable or safe for advanced procedures,such as colectomies,SIL is currently regarded as the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use.The small incision through the umbilicus allows surgeons to use familiar standard laparoscopic instruments and thus,perform even complex procedures which require extraction of large surgical specimens orintestinal anastomosis.The cosmetic result from SIL is also better because the only incision is made through the umbilicus which can hide the wound effectively after operation.However,SIL raises a number of specific new challenges compared with the laparoscopic conventional approach.A reduced capacity for triangulation,the repeated conflicts between the shafts of the instruments and the difficulties to achieve a correct exposure of the operative field are the most claimed issues.The use therefore of this new approach for complex colorectal procedures might understandingly be viewed as difficult to implement,especially for oncologic cases.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2014年第20期6073-6080,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic surgery Single-incision surgery Single-access surgery Scarless surgery Technical challenges Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic surgery Single-inci
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Boris Vestweber,Thomas Galetin,Kathrin Lammerting,Claudia Paul,Jeanette Giehl,Eberhard Straub,Bodo Kaldowski,Angelika Alfes,Karl-Heinz Vestweber.Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS?[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2013(2)
  • 2Min-Hoe Chew,Mei-Huan Chang,Wah-Siew Tan,Mark Te-Ching Wong,Choong-Leong Tang.Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2013(2)
  • 3Timothy X. Yang,Terence C. Chua.Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies[J].International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013(1)
  • 4A. K.‐Y. Fung,E. H. Aly.Systematic review of single‐incision laparoscopic colonic surgery[J].Br J Surg.2012(10)
  • 5Cristiano G. Huscher,Andrea Mingoli,Giovanna Sgarzini,Andrea Mereu,Barbara Binda,Gioia Brachini,Silvia Trombetta.Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study[J].The American Journal of Surgery.2012(1)
  • 6Vasileios Vasilakis,Clarence E. Clark,Lampros Liasis,Harry T. Papaconstantinou.Noncosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: A case-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopic technique[J].Journal of Surgical Research.2012
  • 7Tomoki Makino,Jeffrey W. Milsom,Sang W. Lee.Feasibility and Safety of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Systematic Review[J].Annals of Surgery.2012(4)
  • 8Yan-Ming Zhou,Lu-Peng Wu,Yan-Fang Zhao,Dong-Hui Xu,Bin Li.Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for Colorectal Disease: A Meta-Analysis[J].Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2012(8)
  • 9Jensen Poon,Chi-Wai Cheung,Joe Fan,Oswen Lo,Wai-Lun Law.Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2012(10)
  • 10C.‐C.Lu,S.‐E.Lin,K.‐C.Chung,K.‐M.Rau.Comparison of clinical outcome of single‐incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease[J].Colorectal Disease.2012(4)

共引文献6

同被引文献86

引证文献16

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部