期刊文献+

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring chemotherapeutic efficacy in gastric cancer 被引量:12

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring chemotherapeutic efficacy in gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To assess intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) for monitoring early efficacy of chemotherapy in a human gastric cancer mouse model.METHODS: IVIM-DWI was performed with 12 b-values (0-800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>) in 25 human gastric cancer-bearing nude mice at baseline (day 0), and then they were randomly divided into control and 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-d treatment groups (n = 5 per group). The control group underwent longitudinal MRI scans at days 1, 3, 5 and 7, and the treatment groups underwent subsequent MRI scans after a specified 5-fluorouracil/calcium folinate treatment. Together with tumor volumes (TV), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM parameters [true water molecular diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion fraction (f) and pseudo-related diffusion coefficient (D<sup>*</sup>)] were measured. The differences in those parameters from baseline to each measurement (&#x00394;TV%, &#x00394;ADC%, &#x00394;D%, &#x00394;f% and &#x00394;D<sup>*</sup>%) were calculated. After image acquisition, tumor necrosis, microvessel density (MVD) and cellular apoptosis were evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin (HE), CD31 and terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining respectively, to confirm the imaging findings. Mann-Whitney test and Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis were performed.RESULTS: The observed relative volume increase (&#x00394;TV%) in the treatment group were significantly smaller than those in the control group at day 5 (&#x00394;TV<sub>treatment</sub>% = 19.63% &#x000b1; 3.01% and &#x00394;TV<sub>control</sub>% = 83.60% &#x000b1; 14.87%, P = 0.008) and day 7 (&#x00394;TV<sub>treatment</sub>% = 29.07% &#x000b1; 10.01% and &#x00394;TV<sub>control</sub>% = 177.06% &#x000b1; 63.00%, P = 0.008). The difference in &#x00394;TV% between the treatment and the control groups was not significant at days 1 and 3 after a short duration of treatment. Increases in ADC in the treatment group (&#x00394;ADC%<sub>treatment</sub>, median, 30.10% &#x000b1; 18.32%, 36.11% &#x000b1; 21.82%, 45.22% &#x000b1; 24.36%) were significantly higher compared with the control group (&#x00394;ADC%<sub>control</sub>, median, 4.98% &#x000b1; 3.39%, 6.26% &#x000b1; 3.08%, 9.24% &#x000b1; 6.33%) at days 3, 5 and 7 (P = 0.008, P = 0.016, P = 0.008, respectively). Increases in D in the treatment group (&#x00394;D%<sub>treatment</sub>, median 17.12% &#x000b1; 8.20%, 24.16% &#x000b1; 16.87%, 38.54% &#x000b1; 19.36%) were higher than those in the control group (&#x00394;D%<sub>control</sub>, median -0.13% &#x000b1; 4.23%, 5.89% &#x000b1; 4.56%, 5.54% &#x000b1; 4.44%) at days 1, 3, and 5 (P = 0.032, P = 0.008, P = 0.016, respectively). Relative changes in f were significantly lower in the treatment group compared with the control group at days 1, 3, 5 and 7 follow-up (median, -34.13% &#x000b1; 16.61% vs 1.68% &#x000b1; 3.40%, P = 0.016; -50.64% &#x000b1; 6.82% vs 3.01% &#x000b1; 6.50%, P = 0.008; -49.93% &#x000b1; 6.05% vs 0.97% &#x000b1; 4.38%, P = 0.008, and -46.22% &#x000b1; 7.75% vs 8.14% &#x000b1; 6.75%, P = 0.008, respectively). D* in the treatment group decreased significantly compared to those in the control group at all time points (median, -32.10% &#x000b1; 12.22% vs 1.85% &#x000b1; 5.54%, P = 0.008; -44.14% &#x000b1; 14.83% vs 2.29% &#x000b1; 10.38%, P = 0.008; -59.06% &#x000b1; 19.10% vs 3.86% &#x000b1; 5.10%, P = 0.008 and -47.20% &#x000b1; 20.48% vs 7.13% &#x000b1; 9.88%, P = 0.016, respectively). Furthermore, histopathologic findings showed positive correlations with ADC and D and tumor necrosis (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.720, P &#x0003c; 0.001; r<sub>s</sub> = 0.522, P = 0.007, respectively). The cellular apoptosis of the tumor also showed positive correlations with ADC and D (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.626, P = 0.001; r<sub>s</sub> = 0.542, P = 0.005, respectively). Perfusion-related parameters (f and D<sup>*</sup>) were positively correlated to MVD (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.618, P = 0.001; r<sub>s</sub> = 0.538, P = 0.006, respectively), and negatively correlated to cellular apoptosis of the tumor (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.550, P = 0.004; r<sub>s</sub> = -0.692, P &#x0003c; 0.001, respectively).CONCLUSION: IVIM-DWI is potentially useful for predicting the early efficacy of chemotherapy in a human gastric cancer mouse model. AIM: To assess intravoxel incoherent motion diffusionweighted imaging(IVIM-DWI) for monitoring early efficacy of chemotherapy in a human gastric cancer mouse model.METHODS: IVIM-DWI was performed with 12 b-values(0-800 s/mm2) in 25 human gastric cancer-bearing nude mice at baseline(day 0), and then they were randomly divided into control and 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-d treatment groups(n = 5 per group). The control group underwent longitudinal MRI scans at days 1, 3, 5 and 7, and the treatment groups underwent subsequent MRI scans after a specified 5-fluorouracil/calciumfolinate treatment. Together with tumor volumes(TV), the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) and IVIM parameters [true water molecular diffusion coefficient(D), perfusion fraction(f) and pseudo-related diffusion coefficient(D*)] were measured. The differences in those parameters from baseline to each measurement(ΔTV%, ΔADC%, ΔD%, Δf% and ΔD*%) were calculated. After image acquisition, tumor necrosis, microvessel density(MVD) and cellular apoptosis were evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin(HE), CD31 and terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling(TUNEL) staining respectively, to confirm the imaging findings. Mann-Whitney test and Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis were performed.RESULTS: The observed relative volume increase(ΔTV%) in the treatment group were significantly smaller than those in the control group at day 5(ΔTV_(treatment)% = 19.63% ± 3.01% and ΔTVcontrol% = 83.60% ± 14.87%, P = 0.008) and day 7(ΔTV_(treatment)% = 29.07% ± 10.01% and ΔTV_(control)% = 177.06% ± 63.00%, P = 0.008). The difference in ΔTV% between the treatment and the control groups was not significant at days 1 and 3 after a short duration of treatment. Increases in ADC in the treatment group(ΔADC%_(treatment), median, 30.10% ± 18.32%, 36.11% ± 21.82%, 45.22% ± 24.36%) were significantly higher compared with the control group(ΔADC%_(control), median, 4.98% ± 3.39%, 6.26% ± 3.08%, 9.24% ± 6.33%) at days 3, 5 and 7(P = 0.008, P = 0.016, P = 0.008, respectively). Increases in D in the treatment group(ΔD%_(treatment), median 17.12% ± 8.20%, 24.16% ± 16.87%, 38.54% ± 19.36%) were higher than those in the control group(ΔD%_(control), median-0.13% ± 4.23%, 5.89% ± 4.56%, 5.54% ± 4.44%) at days 1, 3, and 5(P = 0.032, P = 0.008, P = 0.016, respectively). Relative changes in f were significantly lower in the treatment group compared with the control group at days 1, 3, 5 and 7 follow-up(median,-34.13% ± 16.61% vs 1.68% ± 3.40%, P = 0.016;-50.64% ± 6.82% vs 3.01% ± 6.50%, P = 0.008;-49.93% ± 6.05% vs 0.97% ± 4.38%, P = 0.008, and-46.22% ± 7.75% vs 8.14% ± 6.75%, P = 0.008, respectively). D* in the treatment group decreased significantly compared to those in the control group at all time points(median,-32.10% ± 12.22% vs 1.85% ± 5.54%, P = 0.008;-44.14% ± 14.83% vs 2.29% ± 10.38%, P = 0.008;-59.06% ± 19.10% vs 3.86% ± 5.10%, P = 0.008 and-47.20% ± 20.48% vs 7.13% ± 9.88%, P = 0.016, respectively). Furthermore, histopathologic findings showed positive correlations with ADC and D and tumor necrosis(r_s = 0.720, P < 0.001; r_s = 0.522, P = 0.007, respectively). The cellular apoptosis of the tumor also showed positive correlations with ADC and D(r_s = 0.626, P = 0.001; r_s = 0.542, P = 0.005, respectively). Perfusionrelated parameters(f and D*) were positively correlated to MVD(r_s = 0.618, P = 0.001; r_s = 0.538, P = 0.006, respectively), and negatively correlated to cellular apoptosis of the tumor(r_s =-0.550, P = 0.004; r_s =-0.692, P < 0.001, respectively).CONCLUSION: IVIM-DWI is potentially useful for predicting the early efficacy of chemotherapy in a human gastric cancer mouse model.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第24期5520-5531,共12页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by National Research Foundation of South Korea,No.NRF-2013R1A1A2013878 and No.2015R1A2A2A01007827
关键词 Gastric cancer Microvessel density Nude mouse model Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging Terminal-deoxynucleoitidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling Gastric cancer Microvessel density Nude mouse model Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusionweighted i
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1D. M. Koh,E. Scurr,D. J. Collins,A. Pirgon,B. Kanber,N. Karanjia,G. Brown,M. O. Leach,J. E. Husband.??Colorectal hepatic metastases: quantitative measurements using single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging(J)European Radiology . 2006 (9)
  • 2Ross Brian D,Moffat Bradford A,Lawrence Theodore S,Mukherji Suresh K,Gebarski Stephen S,Quint Douglas J,Johnson Timothy D,Junck Larry,Robertson Patricia L,Muraszko Karin M,Dong Qian,Meyer Charles R,Bland Peyton H,McConville Patrick,Geng Hair.Evaluation of cancer therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Molecular Cancer . 2003
  • 3Le Bihan D,Breton E,Lallemand D,et al.MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology . 1986
  • 4Dow-Mu Koh,David J. Collins,Matthew R. Orton.Intravoxel Incoherent Motion in Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Reality and Challenges. American Journal of Roentgenology . 2011
  • 5Ma Jie,Waxman David J.Combination of antiangiogenesis with chemotherapy for more effective cancer treatment. Molecular Cancer . 2008
  • 6Antonia Digklia,Anna Dorothea Wagner.Advanced gastric cancer:Current treatment landscape and future perspectives[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2016,22(8):2403-2414. 被引量:121
  • 7Marilyn J. Siegel,Clint E. Jokerst,Dhana Rajderkar,Charles F. Hildebolt,Sagun Goyal,Farrokh Dehdashti,Nina Wagner Johnston,Barry A. Siegel.??Diffusion‐weighted MRI for staging and evaluation of response in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a pilot study(J)NMR Biomed. . 2014 (6)
  • 8Hiroshi Shinmoto,Chiharu Tamura,Shigeyoshi Soga,Eisuke Shiomi,Nobuyuki Yoshihara,Tatsumi Kaji,Robert V. Mulkern.??An Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Study of Prostate Cancer(J)American Journal of Roentgenology . 2012 (4)
  • 9Ali Sadeghi-Naini,Omar Falou,John M Hudson,Colleen Bailey,Peter N Burns,Martin J Yaffe,Greg J Stanisz,Michael C Kolios,Gregory J Czarnota.??Imaging innovations for cancer therapy response monitoring(J)Imaging Med. . 2012 (3)
  • 10Yuxi Pang,Baris Turkbey,Marcelino Bernardo,Jochen Kruecker,Samuel Kadoury,Maria J. Merino,Bradford J. Wood,Peter A. Pinto,Peter L. Choyke.??Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: An evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b ‐value combinations(J)Magn Reson Med . 2012 (2)

二级参考文献2

共引文献160

同被引文献86

引证文献12

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部