期刊文献+

Comparison of Risk Assessment for a Nuclear Power Plant Construction Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process 被引量:6

Comparison of Risk Assessment for a Nuclear Power Plant Construction Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Recently, plant construction throughout the world, including nuclear power plant construction, has grown significantly. The scale of Korea’s nuclear power plant construction in particular, has increased gradually since it won a contract for a nuclear power plant construction project in the United Arab Emirates in 2009. However, time and monetary resources have been lost in some nuclear power plant construction sites due to lack of risk management ability. The need to prevent losses at nuclear power plant construction sites has become more urgent because it demands professional skills and large-scale resources. Therefore, in this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) were applied in order to make comparisons between decision-making methods, to assess the potential risks at nuclear power plant construction sites. To suggest the appropriate choice between two decision-making methods, a survey was carried out. From the results, the importance and the priority of 24 risk factors, classified by process, cost, safety, and quality, were analyzed. The FAHP was identified as a suitable method for risk assessment of nuclear power plant construction, compared with risk assessment using the AHP. These risk factors will be able to serve as baseline data for risk management in nuclear power plant construction projects. Recently, plant construction throughout the world, including nuclear power plant construction, has grown significantly. The scale of Korea’s nuclear power plant construction in particular, has increased gradually since it won a contract for a nuclear power plant construction project in the United Arab Emirates in 2009. However, time and monetary resources have been lost in some nuclear power plant construction sites due to lack of risk management ability. The need to prevent losses at nuclear power plant construction sites has become more urgent because it demands professional skills and large-scale resources. Therefore, in this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) were applied in order to make comparisons between decision-making methods, to assess the potential risks at nuclear power plant construction sites. To suggest the appropriate choice between two decision-making methods, a survey was carried out. From the results, the importance and the priority of 24 risk factors, classified by process, cost, safety, and quality, were analyzed. The FAHP was identified as a suitable method for risk assessment of nuclear power plant construction, compared with risk assessment using the AHP. These risk factors will be able to serve as baseline data for risk management in nuclear power plant construction projects.
作者 Dae-Woong Shin Yoonseok Shin Gwang-Hee Kim Dae-Woong Shin;Yoonseok Shin;Gwang-Hee Kim(Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon-si, South Korea;Department of Plant & Architectural Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon-si, South Korea)
出处 《Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research》 2016年第3期157-171,共15页 房屋建造与规划研究(英文)
关键词 COMPONENT Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Nuclear Power Plant Reactor Containment Building (RCB) Risk Assessment Component Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Nuclear Power Plant Reactor Containment Building (RCB) Risk Assessment
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献82

;
使用帮助 返回顶部