摘要
GTD (Gestational Trophoblastic Disease) is a pathology that encompasses benign and malignant clinical forms, affects women of childbearing age, has a variable incidence and is more frequent in developing or underdeveloped countries, colliding with the economic barrier. The frequent absence of clear protocols and guidelines for the correct diagnosis of the pathology results in inadequate classification, imprecise treatment and failed post-therapeutic observation, increasing the risk of relapses, morbidity and mortality. The present study aims to point out updated national and international practice protocols of diagnosis of GTD, through an integrative review. Seven articles were selected and it was observed that the main international reference centers are agreed with the management suggested by the IFGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), being the conduct in the Hydatidiform Mole (HM): evacuation by suction and curettage under ultrasound guidance, followed by hCG monitoring every 1 - 2 weeks until normalized (usually one month for Partial Hydatidiform Mole six months for Complete Hydatidiform Mole and one year for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia). Unfortunately, regarding the diagnosis of MH, the guidelines of some countries show the absence or difficulty of access to the karyotype test and ploid p57 or pelvic ultrasound accompanying the uterine curettage, contrary to what is proposed by the IFGO guideline. Establishing and complying with consistent guidelines can improve patient care, with early diagnosis of the pathology and its complications, reducing the rate of recurrence, morbidity and mortality, especially in less developed countries.
GTD (Gestational Trophoblastic Disease) is a pathology that encompasses benign and malignant clinical forms, affects women of childbearing age, has a variable incidence and is more frequent in developing or underdeveloped countries, colliding with the economic barrier. The frequent absence of clear protocols and guidelines for the correct diagnosis of the pathology results in inadequate classification, imprecise treatment and failed post-therapeutic observation, increasing the risk of relapses, morbidity and mortality. The present study aims to point out updated national and international practice protocols of diagnosis of GTD, through an integrative review. Seven articles were selected and it was observed that the main international reference centers are agreed with the management suggested by the IFGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), being the conduct in the Hydatidiform Mole (HM): evacuation by suction and curettage under ultrasound guidance, followed by hCG monitoring every 1 - 2 weeks until normalized (usually one month for Partial Hydatidiform Mole six months for Complete Hydatidiform Mole and one year for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia). Unfortunately, regarding the diagnosis of MH, the guidelines of some countries show the absence or difficulty of access to the karyotype test and ploid p57 or pelvic ultrasound accompanying the uterine curettage, contrary to what is proposed by the IFGO guideline. Establishing and complying with consistent guidelines can improve patient care, with early diagnosis of the pathology and its complications, reducing the rate of recurrence, morbidity and mortality, especially in less developed countries.
作者
Maira de Lima Oliveira Mota
Marcela Curvêllo Beltrão
Elizabeth Bacha
Eduardo Fonseca Mascarenhas Filho
Maísa Mendonça de Jesus
Nelson Henriky Felix Mascarenhas
Tallys Leandro Barbosa da Silva
Maria Fernanda Telles Pires de Souza
Victoria de Oliveira Carmo Borges
Séfora Maria Fragoso Braga
Maira de Lima Oliveira Mota;Marcela Curvêllo Beltrão;Elizabeth Bacha;Eduardo Fonseca Mascarenhas Filho;Maísa Mendonça de Jesus;Nelson Henriky Felix Mascarenhas;Tallys Leandro Barbosa da Silva;Maria Fernanda Telles Pires de Souza;Victoria de Oliveira Carmo Borges;Séfora Maria Fragoso Braga(Centro Universitário Tiradentes (UNIT), Maceió, Brasil;Estácio de Juazeiro do Norte (FMJ), Ceará, Brasil;Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL), Maceió, Brasil;São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brasil;Hospital Regional de Arapiraca, Arapiraca, Brasil)
出处
《Health》
CAS
2023年第1期48-58,共11页
健康(英文)