期刊文献+

鼻腔滴注与气管滴注脂多糖建立小鼠急性肺损伤模型的比较研究 被引量:5

Comparison of Acute Lung Injury Mice Model Established by Intranasal and Intratracheal Instillation of Lipopolysaccharide
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过比较鼻腔滴注与气管滴注脂多糖(lipopolysaccharide,LPS)建立的急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)小鼠模型在不同时间点肺组织损伤情况,为探讨ALI的发病机制及治疗研究提供动物模型。方法:小鼠以LPS 5 mg/kg鼻腔滴注和气管滴注20μL/20 g复制ALI模型,分别在造模后6、12和24 h取材,通过检测支气管肺泡灌洗液(bronchoalveolar lavage fluid,BALF)中白细胞数量、总蛋白浓度、白介素-1β(IL-1β)、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-2(MIP-2)含量,以及肺组织湿/干质量(W/D)比、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)活力、HE染色、免疫荧光染色和TLR4蛋白表达来反映中性粒细胞浸润、炎症反应以及肺微血管损伤情况。结果:与正常对照组相比,鼻腔滴注和气管滴注LPS后BALF中白细胞数目和总蛋白浓度逐渐升高(P<0.01),12 h时白细胞数量分别为(3.007±0.121)×10^(5)个/mL、(3.459±0.258)×10^(5)个/mL,总蛋白浓度分别为(0.502±0.037)mg/mL和(0.592±0.006)mg/mL;滴注LPS后6 h BALF中IL-1β和TNF-α含量升高,12 h BALF中IL-6和MIP-2活力升高;12 h和24 h肺组织W/D比值、MPO活力、Ly-6G表达、中性粒细胞浸润及炎症反应显著升高(P<0.01);气管滴注后6 h TLR4蛋白表达显著上调,而鼻腔滴注后12 h TLR4蛋白表达显著上调(P<0.01)。结论:鼻腔与气管滴注LPS均可制备小鼠ALI模型,与鼻腔滴注法相比,气管滴注法激活TLR4时间较早,肺组织炎症反应较高。 Objective:To compare the lung injury of acute lung injury(ALI)mouse models established by intranasal and intratracheal instillation of lipopolysaccharide(LPS)at different time points,so as to provide an animal model for exploring the pathogenesis and therapeutic method of ALI.Methods:Mouse model was established with 20μL/20 g LPS(5 mg/kg)through intranasal and intratracheal instillation,respectively,and samples were collected at 6,12 and 24 h after modeling,separately.The white blood cell count,total protein concentration,content of interleukin(IL)-1β,IL-6,tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-α,and macrophage inflammatory protein(MIP)-2 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF),lung wet-to-dry(W/D)weight ratio,myeloperoxidase(MPO)activity,and Toll-like receptor 4(TLR4)protein expression were detected and hematoxylin-eosin(HE)staining and immunofluorescence staining were performed to examine the neutrophil infiltration,inflammatory reaction,and pulmonary microvascular injury.Results:White blood cell count and total protein concentration in BALF increased gradually after intranasal and intratracheal instillation of LPS compared with those in the control.At 12 h,the white blood cell count was(3.007±0.121)×10^(5)/mL and(3.459±0.258)×10^(5)/mL,separately,while the total protein concentration was(0.502±0.037)mg/mL and(0.592±0.006)mg/mL,respectively.The levels of IL-1βand TNF-αwere high in BALF 6 h after LPS instillation,while those of IL-6 and MIP-2 were high 12 h after the instillation.Lung W/D weight ratio,MPO content,and Ly-6 G expression were increased significantly and neutrophil infiltration and inflammatory reaction of lung tissue were enhanced significantly at 12 h and 24 h.The expression of TLR4 protein was significantly up-regulated 6 h after intratracheal instillation and 12 h after intranasal instillation.Conclusion:Both intranasal and intratracheal instillation of LPS are feasible for the establishment of ALI mouse model.Compared with intranasal instillation,intratracheal instillation activates TLR4 early and induces strong inflammatory reaction of lung tissue.
作者 陈俭双 朱艳慧 胥芷灵 王孟琰 吕田田 李明明 贾永艳 Chen Jianshuang;Zhu Yanhui;Xu Zhiling;Wang Mengyan;Lv Tiantian;Li Mingming;Jia Yongyan(Henan University of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046;Henan Research Center for Special Processing Technology of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450046)
出处 《中药药理与临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期222-227,共6页 Pharmacology and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica
基金 河南省中医药科学研究专项课题(编号:20-21ZY2147) 河南中医药大学科研启动基金(编号:RSBSJJ2019-08)
关键词 急性肺损伤 脂多糖 鼻腔滴注 气管滴注 Acute lung injury Lipopolysaccharide Intranasal instillation Intratracheal instillation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献112

  • 1李新甫,汪建新.急性肺损伤动物模型研究进展[J].国外医学(呼吸系统分册),2005,25(7):506-508. 被引量:28
  • 2常立文,李文斌.新生儿急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(2):84-86. 被引量:35
  • 3Liu YL,Liu YJ,Liu Y,et al.Hydroxysafflor yellow A ame-liorates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury inmice via modulating toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathways[J].Int Immunopharmacol,2014,23(2):649-657.
  • 4Matsuura M. Structural modifications of bacterial lipopo-lysaccharide that facilitate Gram-negative bacteria evasionof host innate immunity[J].Front Immunol,2013,4:109.
  • 5Kawasaki T,Kawai T.Toll-like receptor signaling pathways[J].Front Immunol,2014,5:461.
  • 6Zhang Y,Lu Y,Ma L,et al.Activation of vascular endothe-lial growth factor receptor-3 in macrophages restrains TLR4-NF-κB signaling and protects against endotoxin shock[J].Immunity,2014,40(4):501-514.
  • 7Han SH,Mallampalli RK. The Acute respiratory distresssyndrome:from mechanism to translation[J].J Immunol,2015,194(3):855-860.
  • 8Bone RC,Balk RA,Cerra FB,et al.Definitions for sepsisand organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovativetherapies in sepsis.The ACCP/ SCCM Consensus Confere-nce Committee.American College of Chest Physicians/ So-ciety of Critical Care Medicine[J].Chest,1992,101(6):1644-1655.
  • 9Matute-Bello G,Downey G,Moore BB,et al. An officialAmerican Thoracic Society workshop report:features andmeasurements of experimental acute lung injury in animals[J].Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol,2011,44(5):725-738.
  • 10Baumgarten G,Knuefermann P,Wrigge H,et al.Role ofToll-like receptor 4 for the pathogenesis of acute lung inju-ry in Gram-negative sepsis[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2006,23(12):1041-1048.

共引文献114

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部