期刊文献+

染色体微阵列分析技术在411例自然流产原因分析中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Cause Analysis of 411 Cases of Abortion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索染色体微阵列分析技术(chromosomal microarray analysis,CMA)在自然流产原因分析中的应用价值。方法采用CMA技术对411例自然流产标本进行全基因组拷贝数变异(copy number variants,CNVs)进行检测。结果411例流产标本,检测成功389例,成功率94.6%。染色体异常标本202例(49.1%),其中染色体数目异常180例,结构异常22例。结论CMA技术能检测出染色体拷贝数变异,可以为流产物检测提供较为全面的评估,为患者解释临床表现并评估预后。 Objective:To explore the application value of chromosome microarray analysis(chromosomal microarray analysis,CMA)in spontaneous abortion cause analysis.Methods:The whole genome copy number variation(copy number variants,CNVs)of 411 spontaneous abortion specimens was detected by CMA technique.Results:In 411 cases of abortion specimens,390 cases were detected successfully,and the success rate was 94.6%.Chromosome abnormalities were found in 202(49.1%),of which 22 were abnormal and 180 were abnormal.Conclusion:CMA technology can detect chromosome copy number variation,provide a more comprehensive evaluation for abortion detection,explain clinical manifestations and evaluate prognosis for patients.
作者 顾惠凤 唐克峰 姜慧萍 GU Hui-feng;TANG Ke-feng;JIANG Hui-ping(Huzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital,Huzhou,Zhejiang 313000,China)
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2020年第7期800-801,862,共3页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2019RC287)
关键词 自然流产 染色体微阵列分析技术 染色体数目异常 染色体结构异常 Spontaneous miscarriage Chromosomal microarray analysis Numerical chromosomal abnormalities Structural chromosomal abnormalities
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage[J]. Lancet, 2006,368(9535):601-611. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0.
  • 2Duncan A, Langlois S, SOGC Genetics Committee, et al. Useof array genomic hybridization technology in prenataldiagnosis in Canada[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2011,33(12):1256-1259.
  • 3American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsCommittee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the useof chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J].Obstet Gynecol, 2013,122(6):1374-1377. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000438962.16108.dl.
  • 4McNamee K, Dawood F, Farquharson RG. Evaluation of arraycomparative genomic hybridization in recurrent miscarriage[J]. BrJ Hosp Med (Lond), 2013,74(1):36-40.
  • 5Stephenson MD, Awartani KA, Robinson WP. Cytogeneticanalysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrentmiscarriage: a case-control study[J]. Hum Reprod, 2002,17(2):446-451.
  • 6Cheung SW, Shaw CA, Yu W, et al. Development andvalidation of a CGH microarray for clinical cytogeneticdiagnosis[J]. Genet Med, 2005, 7(6):422-432. DOI: 10.109701.GIM.0000170992.63691.32.
  • 7Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, et al. Clinical utility of arraycomparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: acohort study of 3171 pregnancies[J]. BJOG, 2012,119(5):614-625. DOI: 10.HH/j.1471-0528.2012.03279.x.
  • 8Shen J, Wu W, Gao C, et al. Chromosomal copy numberanalysis on chorionic villus samples from early spontaneousmiscarriages by high throughput genetic technology[J]. MolCytogenet, 2016,9:7. DOI: 10.1186/sl3039-015-0210-z.
  • 9Strassberg M,Fruhman G, Van den Veyver IB. Copy-numberchanges in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2011,11(6):579-592. DOI: 10.1586/erm.ll.43.
  • 10朱瑞芳,杨滢,张颖,吴星,许争峰,茹彤,胡娅莉.1175例羊水细胞培养染色体核型分析[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2009,26(6):710-711. 被引量:17

共引文献29

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部